KONEČNÉ ZNENIE
A6-0072/2006
27.3.2006
SPRÁVA
o bezpečnosti cestnej premávky: poskytovanie eCall občanom
(2005/2211(INI))
Výbor pre dopravu a cestovný ruch
Spravodajca:
Gary Titley
PE 367.657v03-00
OBSAH
NÁVRH UZNESENIA EURÓPSKEHO PARLAMENTU.........................................................3
DÔVODOVÁ SPRÁVA.............................................................................................................6
POSTUP...................................................................................................................................12
NÁVRH UZNESENIA EURÓPSKEHO PARLAMENTU
o bezpečnosti cestnej premávky: poskytovanie eCall občanom
( 2005/2211(INI) )
Európsky parlament ,
– so zreteľom na bielu knihu Komisie pod názvom Európska dopravná politika do roku 2010: čas rozhodnutia ( KOM(2001)0370 ) a svoje uznesenie z 12. februára 2003 o tejto bielej knihe
Ú. v.
EÚ C 43 E, 19.2.2004, s.
250. ,
– so zreteľom na oznámenie Komisie pod Informačné a komunikačné technológie pre bezpečné a inteligentné vozidlá ( KOM(2003)0542 ),
– so zreteľom na oznámenie Komisie pod názvom Európsky akčný program bezpečnosti na cestách: Do roku 2010 o polovicu znížiť počet obetí dopravných nehôd v Európskej únii: Spoluzodpovednosť ( KOM(2003)0311 ) a jej publikáciu z októbra 2004 pod názvom Záchrana 20 000 životov na našich cestách,
– so zreteľom na odporúčanie Komisie 2004/345/ES zo 6. apríla 2004 o presadzovaní predpisov v oblasti bezpečnosti cestnej premávky
Ú. v.
EÚ L 111, 17.4.2004, s.
75. ,
– so zreteľom na veronskú deklaráciu o bezpečnosti cestnej premávky z 5. decembra 2003, ako aj na závery druhej veronskej schôdze ministrov dopravy členských štátov EÚ z roku 2004 a neskorší záväzok ministrov o priorite bezpečnosti cestnej premávky,
– so zreteľom na oznámenie Komisie pod názvom Iniciatíva i2010 - Európska informačná spoločnosť pre rast a zamestnanosť ( KOM(2005)0229 ),
– so zreteľom na druhé oznámenie Komisie o elektronickej bezpečnosti: Poskytnúť eCall občanom ( KOM(2005)0431 ),
– so zreteľom na článok 45 rokovacieho poriadku,
– so zreteľom na správu Výboru pre dopravu a cestovný ruch ( A6‑0072/2006 ),
A. keďže v roku 2004 zahynulo pri dopravných nehodách na cestách 25 členských štátov EÚ 43 000 ľudí a celoeurópska služba/funkcia palubného tiesňového volania, eCall, by mohla zachrániť 2 500 životov ročne a znížiť vážnosť zranení približne až na 15 % ,
B. keďže zavedenie systému eCall by mohlo znížiť ročné externé náklady na cestnú premávku o takmer 26 miliárd EUR, čo znamená, že občanom by sa odňalo bremeno vo výške 26 miliárd EUR; keďže by sa malo vyvinúť úsilie o zníženie, a nie internalizovanie externých nákladov,
C. keďže existencia systému eCall má potenciál na skrátenie času reakcie na nehody o asi 40 % v mestských oblastiach a približne o 50 % vo vidieckych oblastiach,
D. keďže systém eCall možno len privítať ako prvý stavebný kameň iniciatívy na výrobu inteligentných automobilov
1 KOM(2005)0229 1 ,
E. keďže rozsiahle zavedenie eCall do roku 2009 je prioritou iniciatívy zameranej na elektronickú bezpečnosť,
F. keďže sa dosiahol značný pokrok v oblasti technológií, systémov a služieb elektronickej bezpečnosti a rozvoj systému Galileo takisto poskytuje potenciál pre budúcnosť,
1. víta skutočnosť, že štyri členské štáty na druhom stretnutí na vysokej úrovni venovanom elektronickej bezpečnosti podpísali memorandum o porozumení o eCall, konkrétne Grécko, Litva, Slovinsko a Taliansko, čím sa pridali k Fínsku, Švédsku a poslednému Cypru, ktoré memorandum o porozumení podpísali už skôr;
2. víta záväzok ďalších členských štátov, ktoré už začali proces podpisovania memoranda o porozumení o eCall (Česká republika, Dánsko, Holandsko a Nemecko) a vyzýva tie štáty, ktoré ešte tak neurobili, aby prejavili politickú vôľu na podpísanie memoranda;
3. zdôrazňuje dôležitosť toho, aby všetky členské štáty čo najskôr podpísali memorandum o porozumení o eCall, aby tak dali najavo ostatným zainteresovaným stranám jasné odhodlanie zaviesť službu eCall, ak sa má plne zaviesť v roku 2009;
4. so zreteľom na schválený harmonogram programu Galileo navrhuje, aby sa uvedenie eCall na trh skoordinovalo s úplným uvedením satelitného navigačného systému Galileo do prevádzky, ktoré sa začína v roku 2010;
5. je presvedčený, že na dosiahnutie skutočného pokroku treba memorandum o porozumení zmeniť na predbežnú zmluvu, ktorú čo najskôr podpíšu všetky zainteresované strany;
6. preto naliehavo vyzýva orgány členských štátov, aby zahrnuli informácie o eCall do materiálov na ich kampane na zvýšenie bezpečnosti cestnej premávky;
7. víta jednoznačne kladné stanovisko automobilového priemyslu k zavedeniu systému eCall;
8. poznamenáva, že systém eCall je založený na využívaní 112 a E112 (požiadaviek polohových informácií vo verejných bezdrôtových sieťach v prípade tiesňových volaní);
9. pripomína, že väčšina členských štátov bola pomalá pri zavádzaní používania jednotného európskeho tiesňového čísla 112; vyzýva Komisiu, aby vyhodnotila, ako členské štáty uplatňujú smernicu 2002/22/ES Európskeho parlamentu a Rady zo 7. marca 2002 o univerzálnej službe a právach užívateľov 2 vzhľadom na náležité odpovede a spracovanie volaní na jednotné európske číslo tiesňového volania vrátane určenia polohy volajúceho;
10. naliehavo vyzýva členské štáty, aby čo najskôr dokončili zavádzanie E112 a aby podporili používanie 112 a E112 a podnikli kroky na poskytovanie primeranej infraštruktúry v strediskách tiesňového volania ( Public Service Answering Points - PSAP), ako je jazyková príprava, dostupnosť, určovanie polohy a spracovanie volaní s cieľom naplniť nariadenie o E112, ktoré potom počíta s postupnou modernizáciu na spracovanie volaní v rámci systému eCall;
11. berie na vedomie rozdiely v odhadoch nákladov na palubný systém eCall medzi Komisiou a predstaviteľmi priemyslu;
12.. vyzýva Komisiu a predstaviteľov priemyslu, aby vypracovali hlbšiu analýzu efektívnosti nákladov pre každý krok, ktorý sa urobí pri zavádzaní systému eCall;
13. uvedomuje si, že technológia potrebná pre eCall uľahčí skoré prijatie ďalších inovatívnych aplikácií aktívnej bezpečnosti znížením okrajových nákladov na ich zavádzanie;
14. uvedomuje si, že mnohé nové technológie nemožno zaviesť okamžite, a preto vyzýva Komisiu a predstaviteľov priemyslu, aby preskúmali možnosti postupného a celoplošného zavádzania eCall prostredníctvom kombinácie palubných systémov a alternatívnych systémov ako je používanie mobilných telefónov vodičmi a technológie Bluetooth, ako aj zabudovaných mobilných telefónov, pričom sa bude venovať osobitná pozornosť právu na súkromie vodičov a cestujúcich;
15.. so zreteľom na potenciálne náklady na systéme eCall, ktoré môžu byť vyššie v regiónoch postihnutých trvalými obmedzeniami, a uvedomujúc si skutočnosť, že mnohé nové technológie môžu byť drahé a kupujúci nových vozidiel (najmä lacnejších áut) nie vždy chcú alebo môžu zaplatiť všetky náklady; vyzýva všetky zúčastnené strany, aby spolupracovali na definovaní podnetov na urýchlenie zavádzania systému eCall (napr. väzba na systém poistenia);
16. vyjadruje osobitné znepokojenie nad tým, že náklady na eCall môžu byť neúmerne vysoké pre tých ľudí, ktorí ho najviac potrebujú, napríklad pre obyvateľov vidieckych či izolovaných oblastí;
17. víta budúce iniciatívy a oznámenia Európskej komisie v oblasti elektronickej bezpečnosti;
18. poveruje svojho predsedu, aby toto uznesenie postúpil Rade, Komisii, parlamentom a vládam členských štátov.
DÔVODOVÁ SPRÁVA
1.
Presentation of eCall
The eCall scheme is part of the eSafety initiative
Communication on Information and Communications Technologies for Safe and Intelligent Vehicles, COM(2003)0542 , 15.9.2003. .
It consists of the establishment of a harmonised pan-European in-vehicle emergency call.
In case of an accident, the eCall device in the vehicle will transmit an emergency call with data that goes directly to the nearest emergency call centre. eCall can be triggered manually, but in case of a serious accident the car will send the call automatically.
The life-saving feature of eCall is the accurate information it provides on the location of the accident site: the nearest emergency centre (the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP)) is notified immediately, and knows exactly where to go.
This results in a drastic reduction in the rescue time
An immediate localisation of the accident will allow to treat more injuries in the crucial " Golden hour " — an hour of opportunity in which the lives of critically injured people can be saved, or the severity of their injuries reduced, if they are treated by trauma specialists.
The Golden hour principle is based on medical findings demonstrating that the death rate of people with heart or respiratory failure or massive bleeding approaches 100 % one hour after the accident. .
Some private emergency call systems have been developed in the past, and some are in the market now for some car trades, but its penetration is limited (normally reserved to high-end-vehicles) and failed to ensure the appropriate service when the vehicles cross the borders. eCall aims to be introduced in all vehicles in Europe, for all trades and types, and to work anywhere the vehicle will be in Europe, thus giving service to the more than 100 million persons that travel abroad annually by car.
ECall will be built on the single European emergency number, 112, which was recently generalised in the whole EU
The 112 was introduced by Council Decision of 29 July 1991on the introduction of a single European emergency call number (91/396/EEC), Published in the Official Journal L 217, 6.8.1991, p.
31. .
This will ensure interoperability across Europe.
In order to improve localisation of emergency calls, the 112 has a complement, the E112, which should allow immediate localisation of the emergency call
Article 26 of the Universal Service Directive adopted in 2002 (Directive 2002/22/EC of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services published in OJ L 108, 24.4.2002) stipulates the obligation that the public network operators make the caller location of all calls available to the emergency services to the extent technically feasible.
Commission Recommendation of 25 July 2003 on the processing of caller location information in electronic communication networks for the purpose of location-enhanced emergency call services (E112) .
By accelerating the response time to the accident by about 50%, eCall will reduce the severity of the road accidents, thus contributing to the objective of reducing road deaths in the EU
According to E-Merge and the eSafety Driving Group, 5 % to 15 % of road fatalities can be reduced to severe injuries and 10 % to 15 % of severe injuries can be reduced to slight injuries (E-Merge 2004: 49, eSafety group). .
This improvement would meet the objective of reducing road casualties and fatalities that has been fixed in the Commission's European Road safety Action Programme
European Road Safety Action Programme: Halving the number of road accident victims in the European Union by 2010: A shared responsibility, COM 2003(311) final 2.6.2003.
The aim of the Programme is to reduce by 2010 the total number of road deaths from 43 000 to 25 000. and agreed by the Council.
The shorter rescue time - faster arrival of rescue teams, police and towing firms- enables the accident scene to be cleared more quickly, eCall will thus reduce the congestion time and contribute to the efficiency of road transportation in Europe with a reduction of external costs, which could amount to € 4 billion in Europe
The evaluation of the reduction in congestion time as been estimated at 10% in the low-impact case and 20% reduction in the high-impact case (see Study on the potential socio-economic impact of the introduction of Intelligent Safety Systems in Road Vehicles (SEiSS) final report 2005, point 5). .
The overall savings of eCall related to accident reduction, including social and health costs and lost “public” income calculated for the European Community could amount to nearly €21 billion each year.
Taking into account the necessary annual investments on the in-vehicle systems, to upgrade the PSAPs and to train the emergency services staff (estimated € 4.5 billion); a substantial cost-benefit ratio for eCall can be expected.
Even with a lower estimated success rate and higher costs the benefit-cost ratio stays positive
See SEiSS study and E-Merge, 2004. .
For the global organisation of eCall emergency service, Member States will have the choice between direct management or by delegation of management of PSAP public service.
2.
Action plan for the implementation of the scheme
An eCall Driving Group was established to produce framework architecture and a business model for eCall, and to define the roles for both the public and private stakeholders.
It includes representatives from the Member States, the Commission, telecom operators, PSAP operators, vehicle manufacturers, equipment suppliers, motorway operators, automobile clubs, insurance industry and service providers.
The eCall Driving Group has produced a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on implementing eCall.
The aim of the MoU is to ensure that eCall will work in any EU Member State.
The MoU is a commitment of the stakeholders to implement the eCall together
It should however be noted that the MoU does not create any legal obligation between Parties. on the basis of common approved architecture and interface specifications, including the Minimum Set of Data (MSD).
The MoU was signed in August 2004 by the European Commission, ACEA on behalf of the automotive industry and the multi-sector partnership ERTICO on behalf of its partners.
The MoU has now over 50 signatures among which 6 are from Member States.
Other 5 Member States have initiated the procedure for its signature.
Switzerland has also signed the MoU.
The eSafety partners have agreed on a Road Map for eCall roll-out, the main milestones are the following:
a) By the end of 2005 , agreeing on eCall roll-out plan, business model and standards
b) By mid-2006 , full specification of the in-vehicle eCall system and start of development
c) In 2007 , full-scale field tests with early adopters
d) After September 2009 , introduction of eCall as standard equipment in all vehicles entering the market.
3.
Was has been done already?
Ø The eCall Driving Group, with the participation of all stakeholders, has advanced in the specification of the performance criteria for the eCall service.
Ø The Driving Group has produced the first drafts specifications for the different domains of the system (in-vehicle system, interface to mobile networks operators, mobile network, interface to PSAPs, PSAPs)
Ø The Commission requested ETSI to produce the standard protocols to transmit the minimum set of data associated to an eCall from the in-vehicle system to the PSAPs.
ETSI MSG is carrying out this task, and requested 3GPP to investigate the technical requirements for the transmission of the data from the in-vehicle systems to the PSAPs through mobile telephone networks (GSM, GPRS, UMTS).
Standards are expected by end of March 2006
Ø ETSI and CEN have opened a working item to standardise the Minimum Set of Data architecture.
Ø Some Member States (Finland, the Netherlands) are upgrading their emergency services including eCall functionality.
Finland has implemented an eCall testbed.
Implementation of emergency n° 112 in the EU Member States
Situation in Member States
Availability of 112
Available in all Member States
Call answering and handling (PSAP 5 )
Operational in 15 Member States
10 other Member States have deficiencies in language and/or organisation
Deficiencies in language is not a major problem for eCall as the relevant information is transmitted automatically
Caller location (E112)
10 Member States have completed the process
Information-Promotion of 112
10 Member States have taken sufficient action
Implementation of eCall in the EU Member States
Member State
eCall MoU signature
Implementation status
Belgium
Discussion between Ministries
Upgrading and reorganisation of emergency centres
Czech Republic
Procedure started
E112 operational.
Candidate for pilot
Denmark
Procedure started
Germany
Support to eCall.
Lander delegated into Federal Ministry
Signature conditioned to solve data privacy issue
Estonia
Greece
Signed
Spain
Regional competence
E112 operational.
Position paper critical with eCall.
Meeting to follow
France
Discussion between Ministries
Ireland
Italy
Signed
Upgrading emergency services.
Candidate for pilot
Cyprus
Signed
Latvia
Lithuania
Signed
Upgrading emergency centres
Luxembourg
Hungary
Procedure started
Upgrading emergency centres.
Expert meeting Spring 06.
Candidate for pilot
Malta
Discussion between Ministries
Starting socio-economic study
The Netherlands
Procedure started
Upgrading PSAPs.
Implementation on 2006.
Candidate for pilot
Austria
Poland
Portugal
Discussion between Ministries
Slovenia
Signed
Slovakia
Finland
Signed
Testbed operational.
Candidate for pilot
Sweden
Signed
Candidate for pilot
United Kingdom
Subject to financial perspectives
E112 operational.
Research on RSQ on UK PSAPs
4.
What still needs to be done in order to be ready for 2010?
Ø A chievement of the operational implementation of 112 and E112 as the one and only emergency number with localisation in Europe.
In order to have the background service ready for immediate implementation of eCall, Member States should also insure the viability of their PSAPs -, through equipment and upgrading - so as to operate location-enhanced E112 calls and eCalls.
Member States should also ensure that the personnel of PSAPs are capable of adequately handling the eCalls originating from vehicles and that language support is provided.
They should also upgrade their whole rescue chain (PSAPs, dispatching, emergency vehicles, and hospital emergency rooms).
Ø Accelerate the signature of the MoU by Member States in order to give the necessary signal to the industry
Six Member States have already signed the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the phasing-in of the initiative, five other should do so in a near future.
For some MS the agreement will take the form of a support letter instead of a proper signature (Germany and France). and citizens.
As the industry will be willing to finalise investments and equipment if it is sure that Member states give sufficient guarantee on their share of burden to undertake, the main issue lies on Member States' willingness and readiness for providing the background emergency services for 2009-2010 (mainly setting up suitable emergency stations and rescue response capacity).
Ø Make sure that stable and viable standards for e Call technology are finalised by ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute) for mid-2006 at the latest.
Ø Complete the work of the eCall Driving Group defining the specifications of the systems and agreeing on a positive business model.
Ø Launch extensive Field Operational Test with early adopters.
Conclusion of the rapporteur
As it should save around 2,500 lives per annum in the EU and €26 billion in accident and congestion costs, your rapporteur recommends that this initiative should be encouraged and supported by the European Parliament.
The eCall system should be implemented by 2009 and should not be subject to any unnecessary delay.
It is important to note, however, that the automotive or telecommunications industry should not bear any significant costs without the guarantee that public expenditures and actions are also taken at a Member State level along the time line agreed upon in the action plan and the Memorandum of Understanding.
This is particularly important with regard to the objective of having operational PSAPs and a viable chain of emergency services based on E112 localisation data by the end of 2007.
If there is a lack of willingness from stakeholders to act, public and private incentive solutions should be examined by Commission.
Your rapporteur considers that a pan-European in-vehicle emergency call system will add value over and above what national means could provide alone.
POSTUP
Názov
Bezpečnosť cestnej premávky: poskytovanie eCall občanom
Číslo postupu
2005/2211(INI)
Gestorský výbor dátum oznámenia udelenia povolenia na schôdzi
TRAN 17.11.2005
Výbor požiadaný o stanovisko dátum oznámenia na schôdzi
ITRE 17.11.2005
Bez predloženia stanoviska dátum rozhodnutia
ITRE 23.11.2005
Rozšírená spolupráca dátum oznámenia na schôdzi
Spravodajca dátum menovania
Gary Titley 11.10.2005
Predchádzajúci spravodajca
Prerokovanie vo výbore
25.1.2006
21.2.2006
Dátum prijatia
21.3.2006
Výsledok záverečného hlasovania
+
-
32
3
2
Poslanci prítomní na záverečnom hlasovaní
Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Petr Duchoň, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Roland Gewalt, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Fernand Le Rachinel, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Michael Henry Nattrass, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Ulrich Stockmann, Georgios Toussas, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Náhradníci prítomní na záverečnom hlasovaní
Zsolt László Becsey, Guy Bono, Nathalie Griesbeck, Zita Gurmai, Anne E. Jensen, Jelko Kacin, Ioannis Kasoulides, Sepp Kusstatscher, Francesco Musotto, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García
Náhradníci (čl. 178 ods. 2) prítomní na záverečnom hlasovaní
Dátum predloženia
23.3.2006
Poznámky (údaje, ktoré sú k dispozícii iba v jednej jazykovej verzii)
