KONČNO
A6-0294/2005
12.10.2005
***II
PRIPOROČILO ZA DRUGO OBRAVNAVO
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o emisijah iz klimatskih naprav v motornih vozilih in spremembi Direktive Sveta 70/156/EGS
(16182/4/2004 – C6‑0222-2005 – 2003/0189B(COD))
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano
Poročevalka:
Avril Doyle
PE 360.265v02-00
Oznake postopkov
* Postopek posvetovanja
večina oddanih glasov
**I Postopek sodelovanja (prva obravnava)
večina oddanih glasov
**II Postopek sodelovanja (druga obravnava)
večina oddanih glasov za odobritev skupnega stališča
absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta za zavrnitev ali spremembo skupnega stališča
*** Postopek privolitve
absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta, razen v primerih, navedenih v členih 105, 107, 161 in 300 Pogodbe ES in členu 7 Pogodbe EU
***I Postopek soodločanja (prva obravnava)
večina oddanih glasov
***II Postopek soodločanja (druga obravnava)
večina oddanih glasov za odobritev skupnega stališča
absolutna večina poslancev Parlamenta za zavrnitev ali spremembo skupnega stališča
***III Postopek soodločanja (tretja obravnava)
večina oddanih glasov za odobritev skupnega besedila
(Vrsta postopka je odvisna od pravne podlage, ki jo predlaga Komisija.)
Spremembe zakonodajnega besedila
Pri spremembah, ki jih predlaga Parlament, je spremenjeno besedilo označeno s krepkim poševnim tiskom. Besedilo, zapisano v navadnem poševnem tisku, označuje tehničnim službam namenjeni del zakonodajnega besedila s predlaganimi popravki, ki se upoštevajo pri pripravi končnega besedila (na primer, očitne napake ali izpustitve v zadevni jezikovni različici). O teh popravkih odločajo pristojne tehnične službe.
VSEBINA
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA......................5
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................8
POSTOPEK..............................................................................................................................10
OSNUTEK ZAKONODAJNE RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
o skupnem stališču Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o emisijah iz klimatskih naprav v motornih vozilih in spremembi Direktive Sveta 70/156/EGS
(16182/4/2004 – C6‑0222-2005 – 2003/0189B(COD) )
(Postopek soodločanja: druga obravnava)
Evropski parlament ,
– ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (16182/4/2004 – C6‑0222-2005),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave
UL C 103E, 29. 4. 2004, str. 600. o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0492 )
Še neobjavljeno v UL. ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) Pogodbe ES,
– ob upoštevanju člena 62 svojega Poslovnika,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A6‑0294/2005 ),
1. sprejme skupno stališče, kot je bilo spremenjeno;
2. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Skupno stališče Sveta
Predlogi sprememb Parlamenta
Predlog spremembe
1
ČLEN 5, ODSTAVEK 5 A (novo)
5a. Države članice lahko takoj začnejo spodbujati vgradnjo klimatskih naprav, ki uporabljajo plin, na primer CO 2 , ki je učinkovit in ima majhen potencial globalnega segrevanja. Če države članice uvedejo fiskalne ali druge spodbude za spodbujanje vgradnje naprav z manjšim potencialom globalnega segrevanja, o teh ukrepih obvestijo Komisijo.
Obrazložitev
Ponovna uvedba predloga spremembe iz prve obravnave v spremenjeni obliki.
Predlog spremembe
21
ČLEN 6 A (novo)
Člen 6a
Označevanje
Brez poseganja v določbe Direktive Sveta 67/548/EGS in Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 1999/45/ES glede označevanja nevarnih snovi in pripravkov se motorna vozila iz člena 2 te direktive, če so opremljena s klimatsko napravo, konstruirano tako, da vsebuje fluorirane toplogredne pline, ne dajejo na trg, razen če je na njih označeno kemijsko ime fluoriranih toplogrednih plinov v skladu z uveljavljeno industrijsko nomenklaturo. Takšna oznaka jasno kaže, da klimatska naprava vsebuje fluorirane toplogredne pline in navaja njihov potencial globalnega segrevanja. To je jasno in neizbrisno označeno na vozilu, kakršnem koli oglasu in informacijah o prodaji. Takšna oznaka se namesti na zunanjost vozila tako, da je jasno vidna in ni zakrita.
Obrazložitev
Potrošniki morajo biti ustrezno obveščeni, da se lahko odločijo o vrsti klimatske naprave, ki jo bodo kupili. Ta odločitev lahko prispeva k zaščiti našega podnebja, ker se mobilne klimatske naprave ne morejo hermetično zapreti ter ker na emisije vplivajo tresljaji vožnje in povečana teža vozila.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
1. Response to Climate Change
The overall objective of the Commission proposal is to make a significant contribution towards the European Community’s Kyoto Protocol target by introducing cost-effective mitigation measures. Action to reduce emissions of fluorinated gases needs to be considered in the context of wider efforts being taken to combat climate change. Climate change is recognised as one of the greatest environmental and economic challenges facing humanity. This Directive together with the Regulation on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases provide a legislative framework at the Community level to improve the containment and monitoring of fluorinated gases, as well as to introduce marketing and use restrictions for certain applications.
2. The Common Position(s)
Whereas the original Commission proposal was in the form of one Regulation with a single market legal base (Article 95), the Council reached a Common Position which took the form of two separate texts, a Directive based on Article 95 and a Regulation based on a dual legal base consisting of Articles 175 and 95. The rationale for the split of the Commission proposal into two different texts was to move all the requirements relating to emissions from air conditioning in motor vehicles from the proposed Regulation to a new Directive under the framework Directive 70/156/EEC for type-approval of motor vehicles.
In its First Reading the European Parliament did in fact ask for the requirements concerning air-conditioning systems for vehicles to be linked to the type-approval. Council has thus in fact given the European Parliament what it asked for, by presenting this Directive. Many of the European Parliament's other amendments adopted in first reading have also been incorporated in the Common Position. In addition, your rapporteur recognises that the automobile industry is a global one and that vehicles exported outside Europe will need to be provided with a network of mechanics trained in servicing the MAC systems that are produced in the EU.
3. The Rapporteur's Position
The rapporteur welcomes the proposed Directive from the Council which is an important step in combating Climate change. It is vital for the European Union to show that concrete measures are taken within Europe to mitigate emissions of greenhouse gases. It is evident, however, that there is a balance to be struck between being sufficiently ambitious in environmental terms and allowing the internal market to work without too many restrictions or administrative burdens. In addition, your rapporteur recognises that the automobile industry is a global one and that vehicles exported outside Europe will need to be provided with a network of mechanics trained in servicing the MAC systems that are produced in the EU.
a) Legal base
With regard to this Directive, the rapporteur finds that precisely because of internal market consideration, Article 95 is the correct legal base for this Directive. This is due to the fact that the type-approval system is built on a common legislative framework justified by creating a well functioning internal market. This will in fact be the 58th daughter Directive of 70/156/EEC. It is hard to believe that anybody would want to create different type-approval procedures for each individual Member State.
b) Contents of the Directive
The rapporteur is also content with the overall contents of the Directive. As it stands now there will be a phase out of HFC-134a (which has a global warming potential, or GWP, of 1300). A ban will apply to all new vehicle models coming out of production lines as of 2011 and by 2017, every new vehicle produced will have to use alternatives. Even though the dates are slightly less ambitious than the European Parliament wished for it its first reading, the rapporteur is of the opinion that it will be difficult enough for industry to comply with the dates proposed, especially for small and medium sized companies.
The rapporteur is also of the opinion that a balance has to be struck between being technology prescriptive on the one hand in relation to the global warming potential of the gases to be allowed according to the Directive and promoting the development of alternative environmental technologies. As it stands now the ban in the Directive applies to gases with a global warming potential higher than 150, meaning that HFC-152a (which has a GWP of about 140) can still be used. This will allow further innovation and development of alternative technologies with regard to air-conditioning systems. The proposed European regulatory framework is significantly more ambitious than the rest of the world, where, instead of substituting HFC-134a for a gas with a lower GWP, the automobile industry is taking the approach of reducing leakage of 134a through developing better contained "enhanced" 134a-based MAC systems.
POSTOPEK
Naslov
Skupno stališče Sveta glede sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o emisijah iz klimatskih naprav v motornih vozilih in spremembi Direktive Sveta 70/156/EEC
Referenčni dokumenti
16182/4/2004 – C6‑0222/2005 – 2003/0189B(COD)
Pravna podlaga
člena 251(2) in 95 ES
Podlaga v Poslovniku
člen 162
Datum 1. obravnave EP– P[5]
31.3.2004
T5-0237/2004
Predlog Komisije
KOM(2003)0492 - C6-0222/2005
Spremenjeni predlog Komisije
KOM(2005)0296
Datum razglasitve prejetja skupnega stališča na zasedanju
4.7.2005
Pristojni odbor Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
ENVI
7.7.2005
Poročevalec(-ka) Datum imenovanja
Avril Doyle
12.7.2005
Nadomeščeni(-a) poročevalec(-ka)
Obravnava v odboru
14.9.2005
Datum sprejetja
11.10.2005
Izid končnega glasovanja
za:
proti:
vzdržani:
43
0
6
Poslanci, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Georgs Andrejevs, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frederika Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Anne Ferreira, Alessandro Foglietta, Françoise Grossetête, , Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Urszula Krupa, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Vittorio Prodi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Jonas Sjöstedt, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Margrete Auken, María del Pilar Ayuso González, Milan Gaľa, Hélène Goudin, Ambroise Guellec, Rebecca Harms, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Miroslav Mikolášik, Pál Schmitt, Renate Sommer, Andres Tarand, Phillip Whitehead
Namestniki (člen 178(2)), navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Datum predložitve– A6
12.10.2005
A6-0294/2005
Pripombe
