KONČNO
A6-0307/2005
Par1
17.10.2005
POROČILO
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006
(C6‑0300/2005 – 2005/2002(BUD))
Oddelek I – Evropski parlament
Oddelek II – Svet
Oddelek IV – Sodišče
Oddelek V – Računsko sodišče
Oddelek VI – Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor
Oddelek VII – Odbor regij
Oddelek VIII (A) – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic
Oddelek VIII (B) – Evropski varuh osebnih podatkov
Del 1: Predlog resolucije
Odbor za proračun
Poročevalec:
Valdis Dombrovskis
PE 362.760v03-00
VSEBINA
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA.....................................................3
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................12
MNENJE ODBORA ZA MEDNARODNO TRGOVINO ........................................................29
POSTOPEK..............................................................................................................................31
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUNSKI NADZOR .............................................................32
MNENJE ODBORA ZA DRŽAVLJANSKE SVOBOŠČINE, PRAVOSODJE IN NOTRANJE ZADEVE 35
POSTOPEK..............................................................................................................................41
Objavljeno posebej
.....Obrazložitev.........................................................................
.....Sklepi Odbora za proračun na sejah, ki so potekale od 4. do 6. oktobra 2005 o osnutkih dopolnitev Oddelkov I, II, IV, V, VI, VII in VIII (A) in VII (B) predloga splošnega proračuna
Del 2 – A6‑0000/2005
PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, oddelek I – Evropski parlament, oddelek II – Svet, oddelek IV – Sodišče, oddelek V – Računsko sodišče, oddelek VI – Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor, oddelek VII – Odbor regij, oddelek VIII (A) – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, oddelek VIII (B) – Evropski varuh osebnih podatkov ( C6‑0300/2005 – 2005/2002(BUD) )
Evropski parlament ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 272 Pogodbe ES,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta 2000/597/ES, Euratom, z dne 29. septembra 2000 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti
UL L 253, 7.10.2000, str. 42. ,
– ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka
UL C 172, 18.6.1999, str. 1. Sporazum, spremenjen s sklepom 2003/429/ES (UL L 147, 14.6.2003, str. 25). ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. marca 2005 o smernicah za oddelke II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII (A) in VIII (B) ter o predhodnem osnutku načrta odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta (oddelek I) za proračunski postopek 2006
Besedila, sprejeta tega dne, P6_TA(2005)0067 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. maja 2005 o načrtu prihodkov in odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta za proračunsko leto 2006 ( 2005/2012(BUD) )
Besedila, sprejeta tega dne, P6_TA(2005)0181 . ,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, ki ga je Komisija predložila 27. aprila 2005 ( KOM(2005)0300 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, ki ga je Svet pripravil 15. julija 2005 ( C6‑0300/2005 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 69 in Priloge IV svojega Poslovnika,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino, Odbora za proračunski nadzor, Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter Odbora za peticije ( A6‑0307/2005 ),
A. ker je sedanja finančna perspektiva za zgornjo mejo določila znesek 6.708 milijonov EUR za razdelek 5 (Upravni izdatki) za leto 2006 po tekočih cenah,
B. ker predhodni predlog proračuna (PPP) za leto 2006 dopušča rezervo približno 10,2 milijona EUR pod zgornjo mejo iz razdelka 5 finančne perspektive za proračunsko leto 2006,
C. ker predlog proračuna (PP) Sveta za leto 2006 dopušča rezervo približno 130,1 milijona EUR pod zgornjo mejo iz razdelka 5 in tako zmanjšuje odhodke za 119,9 milijona EUR,
D. ker je v okviru načrta odhodkov Parlamenta določenih 1.341,6 milijona EUR, kar ustreza najvišji stopnji 20 % razdelka 5,
E. ker zgoraj navedena resolucija z dne 12. maja 2005 o načrtu prihodkov in odhodkov Parlamenta poudarja pomen načel dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in proračunske strogosti pri upravnih izdatkih Parlamenta,
1. ponovno poudarja svojo zavezanost, da evropskim institucijam zagotovi potrebna sredstva za utrditev širitve 2004, za pripravo na naslednjo širitev in za zagotavljanje ustreznega delovanja institucij;
2. poziva vse institucije k smotrni uporabi razpoložljivih proračunskih sredstev, in sicer z izboljšanjem učinkovitosti temeljnih dejavnosti ter doseganjem zastavljenih prednostnih nalog;
3. meni, da je treba izpolniti zahteve za zaposlovanje osebja iz novih držav članic, ki so leta 2004 postali del Unije; od vseh institucij zahteva analizo vzrokov za zamude pri zaposlovanju oz. za stalno nezasedena delovna mesta ter ustrezen odziv s posebnimi ukrepi;
4. se pridružuje mnenju Sveta glede upoštevanja načela proračunske strogosti na področju upravnih izdatkov, vendar meni, da je treba dejanske potrebe vsake institucije ocenjevati posamično; izraža svoje nestrinjanje s Svetom zaradi uporabe metode linearnih vsesplošnih znižanj na področju delovnih mest in proračunskih sredstev, in se zato ograjuje od pristopa Sveta;
5. se strinja z dopuščanjem primerne rezerve pod zgornjo mejo iz razdelka 5 (Upravni izdatki); predlaga ponovno vzpostavitev sredstev za približno 7,4 milijona EUR od znižanja za 15,1 milijona EUR, ki ga je v svoji prvi obravnavi o proračunu drugih institucij določil Svet (Parlament in Svet nista vključena);
Oddelek I - Evropski parlament
Raven sredstev
6. opozarja na predlog predsedstva, da se v proračunu določi na najvišji stopnji 20 % razdelka 5, kar ustreza splošnemu povečanju proračuna Parlamenta za 6,1 % v primerjavi s proračunom 2005, to je nad 4,5 % povprečnega povečanja upravnih izdatkov iz razdelka 5 v predlogu proračuna; potrjuje tradicionalni delež Parlamenta , ki znaša 20 % razdelka 5; poudarja dejstvo, da je Parlament uspešno upošteval zgornjo mejo, ki si jo zadal sam ter je zaradi hitrega plačila za stavbe veliko privarčeval;
7. opozarja, da "stornirana sredstva" in celo črtana proračunska sredstva v zadnjih letih dosegajo precej visoke vsote; meni, da to ni ustrezen način vodenja proračuna; opozarja, da je v letu 2004 znesek "storniranih sredstev" znašal več kot 150 milijonov EUR, od teh je bilo za 27 milijonov EUR črtanih sredstev iz proračuna, za leto 2005 pa je predviden presežek v višini 98 milijonov EUR;
8. odloči se, da vpiše v rezervo 'Začasna sredstva za naložbe institucije v nepremičnine' (postavka 2009) v višini 15 milijonov EUR, da bi tako omogočil nadaljnji nakup;
9. strinja se z dejstvom, da bo v želji omogočanja kapitalskih vložkov za nakup stavb, Odbor za proračun vsak neporabljen znesek znotraj 20 % razdelka 5 v celoti podprl preko spremembe proračuna;
10. opozarja na izjavo v 27. odstavku zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 12. maja 2005 o načrtu odhodkov Parlamenta, ki pravi, da mora biti splošna raven proračuna Parlamenta po temeljiti preučitvi določena na osnovi upravičenih in dejanskih potreb; ocenjuje, da znižanje za 20 milijonov EUR pod 20 % razdelka 5 predstavlja primerno raven in ne bi ogrozilo učinkovitega delovanja Evropskega parlamenta; se odloči, da v ta namen dodeli za proračun Parlamenta 2006 1 321,6 minjona EUR; poudarja dejstvo, da to ne predstavlja precedensa za omejevanje pravice Parlamenta, da uporabi 20 % razdelka 5 v sledečih letih;
11. meni, da je treba k odločitvam o novih prednostnih nalogah pristopati previdno zato, da bi bilo izpolnjevanje finančnih potreb Parlamenta dolgoročno zagotovljeno; opozarja na uvedbo novega Statuta poslancev (v sredini leta 2009), za katerega se predvideva, da bo stal približno 100 milijonov EUR letno;
Informacijske in komunikacijske politike
12. meni, da predlog predsedstva, ki določa znesek 50 milijonov EUR za rezervo „Informiranje“ in dodatni znesek 17,2 milijona EUR za varnostno rezervo, ni v skladu s trenutno stopnjo razvoja novih političnih prednostnih nalog in z načelom proračunske strogosti;
13. ponovno ponavlja svoje stališče, da sta informacijska in komunikacijska politika ena izmed prednostnih nalog Parlamenta ter podpira vlaganje v izboljšanje komuniciranja med državljani EU in Parlamentom; je sklenil, da vsoto 20 milijonov EUR vnese v rezervo "Informiranje in sporočanje", ki bo služila izboljšanju komuniciranja Parlamenta z državljani;
14. meni, da boljša komunikacija svojega dela predpostavlja večjo uporabo moderne (avdiovizualne) tehnologije ter razumljivejšo in privlačnejšo strukturo za razprave v okviru plenarnega zasedanja;
15. opozarja na prednostne naloge v odstavkih 11 in 12 v zgoraj navedeni resoluciji z dne 12. maja 2005 o načrtu Parlamenta, natančneje o izboljšanju službe za obiskovalce in o krepitvi vloge informacijskih pisarn, z namenom decentralizacije dejavnosti informiranja ter njihovega prenosa na države članice, zlasti za izboljšanje stikov med poslanci in državljani;
16. meni, da bi pri vsakem predlogu morali biti jasno razvidni finančni stroški in srednjeročne finančne zahteve; poudarja, da bi morali novi projekti na področju informacijske in komunikacijske politike zagotavljati ustrezne dogovore o pregledu, ki bi vključevali vladajoče organe Parlamenta in politične skupine;
Širitev
17. podpira nadaljnje izboljševanje zagotavljanja storitev z jezikovnega področja za poslance; izraža zaskrbljenost nad velikim številom nezasedenih delovnih mest na tem posebnem področju in meni, da je treba temu vprašanju posvetiti ustrezno pozornost; od uprave pričakuje, da do 17. oktobra 2005 predloži natančne predloge;
18. potrjuje naslednje ukrepe v zvezi s širitvijo:
§ kot je bilo predhodno določeno v načrtu odhodkov, odprtje 113 delovnih mest (77 A*, 14 B* in 22 C*) za sekretariat Parlamenta in 22 delovnih mest (10 A*, 4 B* in 8 C*) za politične skupine v kadrovskem načrtu za leto 2006;
§ v zvezi z delovnimi mesti, ustvarjenimi za širitev maja 2004, bo 12 delovnih mest D* preoblikovanih v C*;
§ nadgradnja petih delovnih mest A*5 v A*9 in petih delovnih mest A*5 v A*12, da bi lahko uradnike iz držav širitve maja 2004 zaposlili na raven srednjih uradnikov;
19. je sklenil, da kot dodatek predvidenim 13,8 milijona EUR zagotovi dodatnih 9,726 milijonov EUR proračunskih sredstev v zvezi s pripravami na pristop Romunije in Bolgarije:
§ da vključi 3.850.000 EUR v postavko 1400 „Drugo osebje“;
§ da vključi 900.000 EUR v postavko 1402 „Konferenčni tolmači“;
§ da vključi 440.000 EUR v postavko 1420 „Zunanje storitve“;
§ da vključi 1.136.000 EUR v postavko 2001 „Letne zakupnine“;
§ da vključi 1.400.000 EUR v postavko 2007 „Opremljanje prostorov“;
§ da vključi 2.000.000 EUR v postavko 4000 „Tekoči upravni izdatki in izdatki za politične in obveščevalne dejavnosti političnih skupin in samostojnih poslancev“;
Preglednejši prikaz proračuna
20. poziva k preglednejšemu prikazu dohodkov iz posojil ali najemnin ali nudenja storitev, kar bi moralo biti jasno razvidno v izkazu prihodkov proračuna Parlamenta;
21. predlaga odpiranje posebne postavke za informacijske pisarne in zahteva, da se število njihovega osebja prikaže v opombi kadrovskega načrta Parlamenta;
22. zahteva, da se stroški za službena potovanja zaradi usposabljanja prikažejo v ločeni proračunski postavki;
Politika na področju nepremičnin
23. obžaluje, da predsedstvo ni ugodilo zahtevam po predložitvi posodobljenega načrta za nakup nepremičnin, vključno z možnostmi nakupa prostorov za informacijske pisarne; zahteva, da se tovrstni podatki predložijo do 17. oktobra 2005; meni, da bi za zagotavljanje ustreznega finančnega načrtovanja Parlament moral imeti jasno politiko na področju nepremičnin;
Kadrovska politika
24. obžaluje, da zahteva predsedstva o zaposlovanju 112 novih ljudi iz starih držav članic ni upoštevala možnosti prerazporejanja obstoječega osebja, kot je navedeno v 6. odstavku zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 12. maja 2005 o načrtih Parlamenta;
25. ponovno opozarja na zahtevo po poročilu do 17. oktobra 2005, ki naj vsebuje podrobne podatke o sedanjem številu pogodbenega in začasnega osebja ter primerjavo obdobij pred in po spremembi statuta; meni, da so bili podatki v prejšnjem poročilu preveč skopi in splošni;
26. zahteva, da uprava Parlamenta vključi v predlog predhodnega predloga načrta odhodkov Parlamenta podrobne podatke o številu pogodbenega osebja znotraj sekretariata Parlamenta in političnih skupin, kot tudi osebja, zaposlenega v informacijskih pisarnah;
27. se je odločil za naslednje ukrepe v zvezi s kadrovskim načrtom:
a) odpreti 18 A* delovnih mest na področju spletnega založništva za zagotavljanje večjezičnosti;
b) odpreti 41 delovnih mest (19 A*, 1 začasno A*, 16 B*, 5 C*) za vsa druga prednostna področja, vključno s sistemom okoljskega ravnanja in presoje (EMAS), varnostno enoto, direktoratom za informacijsko tehnologijo, podporo parlamentarnim službam, GD za zunanjo politiko, GD za informiranje, GD za osebje, GD za infrastrukturo in tolmačenje, GD za finance, podaljšati 4 začasna delovna mesta (3 A* in 1 C*) v pravni službi, ter spremeniti 6 A* začasnih delovnih mest v GD za informiranje v stalna delovna mesta;
c) tehnične nadgradnje 60 delovnih mest A*5 v A*12, 39 delovnih mest B*3 v B*11 in 91 delovnih mest C*1 v C*7, da bi olajšali medinstitucionalne prerazporeditve;
d) vključitev potrebne nadgradnje za izvajanje kadrovske politike Parlamenta za napredovanje in za pravilno izvajanje novih kadrovskih predpisov, ki so uvedli novo strukturo kategorij z naslednjimi razčlenitvami: 245 delovnih mest razreda A*, 87 delovnih mest razreda B*, 573 delovnih mest razreda C* in 35 delovnih mest razreda D*;
e) zagotovitev dodatnih nadgradenj v tajništvih političnih skupin zaradi enakega razloga:
§ 6 A*12 v A*13, 4 A*11 v A*12, 6 A*10 v A*11, 1 A*9 v A*10, 1 A*8 v A*9, 10 A*6 v A*7, 1 A*5 v A*7, 7 A*5 v A*6, 2 B*10 v B*11, 1 B*8 v B*10, 3 B*8 v B*9, 5 B*7 v B*8, 2 B*6 v B*7, 2 B*5 v B*6, 13 B*3 v B*4, 2 C*6 v C*7, 1 C*5 v C*6, 1 C*3 v C*4, 5 C*1 v C*2, 1 D*4 v C*4, 1 D*3 v C*4;
§ ukinitev naslednjih nadgradenj, navedenih v načrtu Parlamenta: 2 A*6 v A*9;
f) eno napredovanje ad personam iz A*14 v A*15 za dolgoletnega uradnika;
g) zagotovitev naslednjih nadgradenj začasnih delovnih mest:
§ tajništvo Parlamenta: 1 A*12 v A*13 za zdravstveno službo;
§ tajništvo samostojnih poslancev: 3 C* v 3 B*;
h) odobritev tehnične prilagoditve v zvezi z zadnjo posebno shemo za predčasno upokojevanje:
§ tajništvo Parlamenta: 1 B*7 v B*8, 3 B*3 v B*5, in 1 C*5 v C*6;
§ politične skupine: 1 A*5 v A*12, 1 B*10 v B*8, 1 B*7 v B*6, in 1 C*1 v B*3;
28. meni, da mora uprava Parlamenta v celoti upoštevati kodeks dobrega ravnanja pri zaposlovanju invalidov;
Drugo
29. se je odločil vnesti zaznamek (p.m.) za razpravo o "Prihodnosti Evrope", čakajoč na odločitve konference predsednikov;
30. od uprave Parlamenta zahteva, da preuči možnost razvijanja pripravniškega programa, ki bo dovoljeval določenemu številu pripravnikov koriščenje pripravniškega programa znotraj Parlamenta; poziva generalnega sekretarja, da o tej zadevi predstavi poročilo; predlaga, da se v rezervi oblikuje 5 delovnih mest (1 A* in 4 B*) za oddelek poklicnega usposabljanja ter novo proračunsko vrstico 1407 Nadomestila za usposabljanje (Pripravniški program Evropskega parlamenta) znotraj zaznamka (p.m.);
31. poziva zaposlene na novo oblikovanih delovnih mestih za sistem okoljskega ravnanja in presoje (EMAS), da preučijo uporabo ekoloških vozil s strani Parlamenta;
32. se je odločil za usklajevanje drugih področij, ki so se spremenila od sprejetja načrta odhodkov:
§ vključitev zaznamka (p.m.) v postavko 3222/02 (Izdatki za arhivske vire: urejanje gradiva poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, predloženih v obliki daril ali volil), kjer se lahko proračunska sredstva prenesejo v proračunsko vrstico, ko predsedstvo konča ocenjevanje politike za zgodovinske arhive;
§ s povečanjem dodelitev v postavko 3200/02 (Pridobivanje strokovnega znanja: strokovnjaki in druge osebe, vključene v zunanje politike EU) za 65.000 EUR;
33. poziva predsedstvo, da preuči načine zmanjševanja visokih stroškov za električni energijo, da sledi na primer japonski pobudi "brez kravate" in zmanjša klimatizacijo v poletnem času;
Druge institucije
34. v zvezi z novo širitvijo je ustvaril nova delovna mesta, da bi zadovoljil ustreznim potrebam institucij; za namene nemotenega delovanja institucij je ponovno vzpostavil del proračunskih sredstev, ki jih je Svet znižal;
35. odobrava nadgradnjo poklicnega razvoja ob upoštevanju določb novih kadrovskih predpisov, sledeč zahtevam institucij in ob soglasju Sveta v PP;
Oddelek II - Svet
36. izraža zaskrbljenost glede dodeljenih proračunskih sredstev za izdatke za dejavnosti na področju SZVP in tudi v zvezi z uvedbo več novih proračunskih vrstic za dejavnosti na področju SZVP/EVOP; opozarja, da bi morali proračuni drugih institucij kriti upravne izdatke;
37. je seznanjen z odpiranjem 161 novih delovnih mest (1 A*15, 4 A*12, 6 A*11, 1 A*10 T, 8 A*9, 12 A*7, 58 A*5, 2 B*7, 6 B*6, 17 B*3, 23 C*4, 23 C*1) in prenos enega C*1 delovnega mesta v Komisijo;
Oddelek IV - Sodišče
38. poziva Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, da do 1. novembra 2005 spremeni svojo upravno odločbo z dne 31. marca 2004 tako, da bo izključevala uporabo službenih avtomobilov v zasebne namene;
39. je sprejel naslednje ukrepe v zvezi s kadrovskim načrtom:
– odprtje petih novih stalnih delovnih mest (4 B*3 in 1 C*1), kot dodatek 22 novim (2 A*14 T, 2 A*12 T, 3 A*11 T, 1 A*10 T, 4 A*6, 1 A*5, 1 B*5 T, 3 B*3, 3 B*3 T, 2 C*1, od tega 18 za novo Sodišče za uslužbence EU), ki jih je Svet že odobril v PP;
– odprtje 16 stalnih delovnih mest za osebje iz Romunije in Bolgarije (10 A*7, 2 B*3 in 4 C*1);
40. poudarja, da odločanje o dokončnem številu delovnih mest za novo Sodišče za uslužbence EU še poteka, odločitev pa bo sprejeta v letu 2005;
41. se je odločil, da poviša proračunska sredstva, ki jih je Svet odobril v PP za 3.400.000 EUR, ki so pretežno namenjeni za plače, zunanje prevajalce in informacijsko tehnologijo;
Oddelek V - Računsko sodišče
42. poziva Računsko sodišče , da do 1. novembra 2005 spremeni svojo upravno odločbo z dne 15. junija 2004 tako, da bo izključevala uporabo službenih avtomobilov v zasebne namene;
43. je sprejel naslednje ukrepe v zvezi s kadrovskim načrtom:
– odprtje 4 novih stalnih delovnih mest (4 B*3), kot dodatek 11 novim (10 A*6 in 1 B*3), ki jih je Svet že odobril v PP, ter ukinitev 1 začasnega mesta A* 12;
44. se je odločil, da poviša proračunska sredstva, ki jih je Svet odobril v PP, za 1.555.000 EUR, pretežno za plače;
Področje VI - Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor (EESO)
45. je sprejel naslednje ukrepe v zvezi s kadrovskim načrtom:
– odprtje 7 novih stalnih delovnih mest (7 B*3), kot dodatek 28 novim (1 A*12, 23 A*6 in 4 B*3), ki jih je Svet že odobril v PP;
46. se je odločil, da poviša proračunska sredstva, ki jih je Svet odobril v PP za 1.190.000 EUR, pretežno za plače in prilagoditev stroškov za zgradbe;
Oddelek VII - Odbor regij (OR)
47. z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da se je gradnja stavbe Belliard končala 15. junija 2004 in ceni dejstvo, da sta Odbor regij in Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor skupaj redno obveščala Parlament o napredovanju gradbenih del; želi, da odbora zahtevata poročilo svetovalne družbe Sicabel, ki je spremljala gradbena dela od začetka obnovitvenega projekta, v katerem naj le-ta potrdi, da je bil projekt izpeljan v skladu s pogodbo in njenimi prilogami; zahteva, da se poročilo predloži Parlamentu pred 1. marcem 2006;
48. je sprejel naslednje ukrepe v zvezi s kadrovskim načrtom:
– odprtje 11 novih delovnih mest (6 stalnih B*3, 2 začasni B*3 in 3 C*1), kot dodatek dvajsetim (1 A*12, 18 A*6, od tega 14 na jezikovnem področju, in 1 začasno delovno mesto A*6), ki jih je Svet že odobril v PP,
49. se je odločil, da poviša proračunska sredstva, ki jih je Svet odobril v PP za 1.259.500 EUR, pretežno za plače in prilagoditev stroškov za zgradbe;
Oddelek VIII (A) - Evropski varuh človekovih pravic
50. je sprejel naslednje ukrepe v zvezi s kadrovskim načrtom:
- odprtje 2 novih začasnih delovnih mest (2 B*3), kot dodatek štirim novim (3 A*5 in 1 C*1), ki jih je Svet že odobril v PP;
51. se je odločil, da poviša proračunska sredstva, ki jih je Svet odobril v PP, za 173.056 EUR;
Področje VIII (B) - Evropski varuh osebnih podatkov
52. je sprejel naslednje ukrepe v zvezi s kadrovskim načrtom:
– odprtje dveh novih stalnih delovnih mest (1 B*8 in 1 C*6), kot dodatek trem novim (3 A*8), ki jih je Svet že odobril v PP;
53. se je odločil, da poviša proračunska sredstva, ki jih je Svet odobril v PP, za 136.600 EUR;
o
o o
54. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo, skupaj z dopolnitvami Oddelkov I, II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII(A) in VIII(B) predloga splošnega proračuna, posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in drugim zadevnim ustanovam ter organom.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
7 June 2005
Overview of the situation in 2006 in heading 5
After the technical adjustment, the ceiling of heading 5 for 2006 amounts to EUR 6 708 million at current prices, compared to EUR 6 661.6 million, as was estimated in the March 2004 report by the Secretaries-General on Trends in Heading 5. Heading 5 grows from 2005 to 2006 with 5.5 %. In addition, as a result of the 2004 salary adjustment (0.7% instead of 2.6%), requirements in 2006 for salaries and pensions are reduced compared to previous estimates.
The 2006 estimates of the other institutions (excluding pensions) have been set at
EUR 2 497.2 million.
Budget 2005
(excl. AB 2/2005)
Estimates 2006
Increase
(excl. AB 2/2005)
Total other sections
2.355.540.949
2.497.238.570
6,0%
Commission administration
3.129.731.309
3.296.000.000
5,3%
Pensions
865.927.000
905.240.000
4,5%
Total heading 5
6.351.199.258
6.698.478.570
5,5%
Heading 5 ceiling
6.360.000.000
6.708.000.000
5,5%
Margin
8.800.742
9.521.430
There is currently in heading 5 for 2006 a margin of around EUR 9,5 million compared to a negative margin of EUR –18.9 million in 2005 at the estimates stage (EUR 8.8 margin in 2005 budget as originally adopted and an estimated EUR 67 million as proposed in PDAB 2/2005 on salary adjustment).
In the March 2005 report by the Secretaries-General on Trends in Heading 5, the 2006 margin was estimated at EUR 15.3 million. The Commission had estimated the margin to amount to EUR 25 million, but the estimates of the Council are currently EUR 15 million higher than the preliminary information available to the Commission when the PDB was presented.
Taking into account the existing margin under heading 5, the availability of sufficient appropriations for the functioning of the institutions should not be a problem during the budget procedure contrary to last year. Even if the starting budgetary situation is positive, the demands of the institutions will be evaluated on the basis of their justification and budgetary rigour.
Key questions for the other sections in the 2006 budgetary procedure
Consolidation and preparing for the next enlargement
Most of the new staff from the 10 new Member States should be recruited by 2006, with the full financial impact on the budgets of the other institutions. The year 2006 will be crucial in the preparations for the next enlargement to include Romania and Bulgaria, projected for 2007. It is important to study carefully the enlargement-related requests on posts and appropriations.
ESTABLISHMENT PLAN
Budget 2005
Estimates 2006 - total new posts
Estimates 2006 - new enlargement posts
Parliament
5.597
135
135
Council
3.234
184
97
Court of Justice
1.717
38
(16 contract staff)
Court of Auditors
736
15
6
Economic and Social Committee
636
38
27
Committee of the Regions
428
47
24
Ombudsman
51
6
3
European Data-Protection Supervisor
19
5
0
Total other sections
12.418
468
292
(excl. contract staff)
Especially in view of the next enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria, a common approach on recruitment is needed.
Currently, some institutions (e.g. EP, Council, EESC and COR) propose to create new posts for the next enlargement, while Court of Justice and EDPS do not. Similarly and linked to creating posts, some institutions intend to recruit new staff as auxiliaries (e.g. Court of Auditors with 6 new posts to be created without appropriations for 2006 and to be filled by auxiliary agents), while Court of Justice plans to employ 16 contract staff and create no new enlargement posts for 2006.
There are also some differences in grading of enlargement posts: some institutions, notably the EP, plan to recruit mainly at base grades, while most of the other institutions propose to create the posts at higher grades. The differences in proposed levels of standard abatement should also be examined.
In the 2006 guidelines report on other sections, Parliament requested the institutions to provide detailed information on their plans for preparations and estimations of the financial consequences of the next enlargement by 1 September 2005. The Rapporteur considers that more detailed information on recruitment is needed to be able to better assess the situation and apply a more harmonised, common approach on new staff in view of the next enlargement.
Efficient and rational use of appropriations
The institutions should improve the quality of spending by using the available appropriations in a more efficient and rational way for their core activities. Reallocation of appropriations and redeployment of staff should be the first option for finding resources to improve the functioning of the institutions and, when assessing proposed new initiatives, the long-term financial implications should be taken into consideration. New expenditure on information policy measures should be well thought-out and focused. Proposals affecting the overall level of the budgets should be submitted timely to allow for a smooth budgetary procedure.
Savings and more efficiency could be created through interinstitutional cooperation in areas such as interpretation and translation, publication, training, buildings projects and IT expenditure. In the 2006 budget guidelines report on other sections, Parliament called for a report by the Commission by 1 July 2005 presenting the benefits to date of interinstitutional cooperation. The rapporteur when assessing the requests of the institutions will make recommendations on the basis of these evaluation results.
The final levels of budgets of the other institutions will be set on the basis of enlargement and non-enlargement related justified budgetary needs and application of an appropriate level of budgetary rigour. For determining the total levels, expenditure on staff and buildings will continue to play a significant role. For several institutions, information and communication expenditure seems to be important as well.
The 2005 budget figures are presented in the table as originally adopted without the expected salary adjustment.
In the individual tables per institution, the amounts are presented in the way the institution in question has presented the figures (some with salary adjustment, some without).
Budget 2005 (excl. AB 2/2005)
Estimates 2006
Increase (excl. AB 2/2005)
2006 estimates as % of heading 5 ceiling
Parliament
1.272.000.000
1.341.600.000
5,5%
20,0%
Council
568.343.403
602.030.000
5,9%
9,0%
Court of Justice
232.346.872
253.904.000
9,3%
3,8%
Court of Auditors
108.560.579
114.596.500
5,6%
1,7%
Economic and Social Committee
103.820.925
109.279.818
5,3%
1,6%
Committee of the Regions
60.277.251
64.484.782
7,0%
1,0%
Ombudsman
7.312.614
7.732.538
5,7%
0,1%
European Data-Protection Supervisor
2.879.305
3.610.932
25,4%
0,1%
Total other sections
2.355.540.949
2.497.238.570
6,0%
37,2%
Towards more comprehensive budgeting
The structure and content of the other institutions' budgets should be more comprehensive. The Rapporteur proposes to organise a Monitoring Group on budget presentation to study this issue in more detail together with interested Members and experts.
The institutions had agreed to clarify the presentation of the other institutions' budgets. The new partially-revised nomenclature has been introduced by some institutions (Parliament, Council and the Ombudsman), while others have not adapted their budget presentation. The Rapporteur is looking for more information on the reasons for the different approaches by the institutions.
Specific issues on other institutions' budgets
Parliament (Section I)
EP
Estimates 2006
1.341.600.000
Budget 2005
1.272.000.000
Budget 2004
1.231.000.000
Total increase in %
5.5%
Organigramme 2005
5597
New posts requested
135 post (next enlargement): 113 in EP Secretariat, 22 in political groups
other possible new posts:
first readng
The European Parliament set its estimates at EUR 1 341.6 million, corresponding to the maximum level of 20% of heading 5. Parliament decided at this stage to enter EUR 90.5 million in the contingency reserve, contrary to the position of the Committee on Budgets to cut this amount by EUR 30 million and to set EUR 10 million in the buildings reserve.
Several key questions, including the final decision on the level of Parliament's budget, were left open at estimates stage to be dealt with in the first reading. For more details, see the resolution of 12 May 2005 on Parliament’s estimates for 2006.
Council (Section II)
Council
Estimates 2006
602.000.000
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 2/2005)
563.051.402
Budget 2004
541.912.200
Total increase in %
6.9 %
Organigramme 2005
3234
New posts requested
184
(97 for next enlargement)
The estimates by the Council Secretariat proposes that Council’s administrative expenditure in 2006 is set at EUR 602 million, which corresponds to an increase of 6.9 % over 2005 budget. Council’s share of heading 5 (including pensions) would account for 9.0 %. As a comparison, Council’s share of heading 5 in 2001 was 7.7 %.
Title 3 (Expenditure arising out of the institutions performance of missions) shows an increase of +19%. This stems from personnel expenditure (+18%: reinforcement of military seconded national experts and payment of full allowance to all seconded national experts) and informatics (+ 53%).
The main issues in Council’s budget for 2006 include:
· Consolidation of the 2004 enlargement (occupation of Lex building in November 2006 with EUR 4.4. additional expenditure in 2006) and preparation for the next enlargement (EUR 7.3 million)
· SESAME (Secured European System for Automatic Messaging): The ESDP and Cortesy computer networks used for communication between Member States and Council’s General-Secretariat will be replaced by the end of 2007. The budgetary impact 2005-2007 is estimated at around EUR 48 million, with an increase of some EUR 9.1 million in 2006.
· Delivery of the OPCEN in 2006: Following the decision of the European Council of 17-18 June 2005 on the establishment of an operations centre, around EUR 10 million will be provided for 2006 (EUR 13 million in 2005)
· Child care: Following the enlargement, the Council plans to open a new creche in September 2006 to cover requirement arising with a budgetary impact of EUR 4.1 million in 2006.
Out of the 184 new posts, 97 posts are requested to meet enlargement needs, 68 correspond to new tasks, 20 are needed for the occupation of the Lex building and one post is transferred to the Commission.
Contrary to the other institutions, the Council does not submit its estimates to the Commission to be included in the PDB documents. In the 2006 guidelines report on other institutions, the Parliament called on the Council – once again - to present its estimates at the same time as the other institutions and to have them published as part of the preliminary draft budget. After examination of the administration’s proposals, the appropriations are voted at Council’s first reading of the budget.
In the 2006 guidelines report on other institutions, the Parliament called on the Council, should it introduce new initiatives, to find resources firstly through reallocation. It also requested the Council to apply the same rigour in establishing its own budget as it applies to the budgets of other institutions. The Rapporteur is planning to examine in more detail the reasons for the above-average increases of the Council's budget in the recent years.
Court of Justice (Section IV)
ECJ
Estimates 2006
253.900.000
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 2/2005)
229.000.000
Budget 2004 (incl. frontloading of EUR 12.6 mio to reduce costs in 2005)
222.400.000
Total increase in %
10.9 %
Organigramme 2004
1717
New posts requested
38
(26 for Civil Service Tribunal)
Section IV covers both the expenditure necessary for the functioning of the Court of Justice and of the Court of First Instance. The estimates by the Court of Justice are set at EUR 253.9 million, which corresponds to an increase of 10.9 % over 2005 budget.
The Court of Justice has made early payments for its buildings, which reduced the budgetary cost for 2005. Part of the budget increase can thus be explained by the fact that due the 2004 frontloading of EUR 12.6 million on buildings, the annual lease-purchase allowance of EUR 10.1 million was not included in the 2005 budget of the Court of Justice. The annual payments for the ‘Annex’ buildings are scheduled to be resumed in 2006. An amount of EUR 8.5 million is therefore entered in the 2006 estimates for lease/purchase payments of property.
In addition, the new Civil Service Tribunal, which is expected to take up its duties at the beginning of 2006, is included in the estimates for 2006 with EUR 6.9 million of additional expenditure. The requested 26 new posts are to be provided for the new Tribunal: 16 for the cabinets of the seven judges and 10 for the Registry.
The other 12 new posts (4 A*6, 7 B*3 and 1 C*1) requested are all for reinforcement of the Informatics and New Technologies Division.
It is proposed to recruit 16 contract staff in the lead-up to enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria. There is an increase of EUR 1.749 million under Article 189 « Supplementary services » for freelance interpretation, proof-reading of texts and translation. Following the decision to cease the paper version version of the « Bulletin » of the Court’s activities and replace it by a document circulated electronically, savings accounting for EUR 395 000 can be made in Chapter 27 « Publishing and information ».
Court of Auditors (Section V)
CoA
Estimates 2006
114.596.500
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 2/2005)
106.948.579
Budget 2004 (incl. frontloading of EUR 204.000 to reduce costs in 2005)
97.799.130
Total increase in %
7.15%
Organigramme 2005
736
New posts requested
15
The estimates by the Court of Auditors are set at around EUR 114.6 million, which corresponds to an increase of 7.15 % over 2005 budget.
Specific events that will have to be financed in the 2006 budget include the end of mandates of eight Members of the Court (EUR 1.6 million), limited preparations for the next enlargement (EUR 471.200 for conversion of offices into two cabinets of Members and employment of auxiliary translators in the new languages), studies on projects on updating K1 building and construction of K3 building (EUR 200.000) and software on accruals accounting (EUR 310.000).
Six new posts in view of the next enlargement are sought in 2006. The Court of Auditors plans to exceptionnally recruit six translators as auxiliaries from Romania and Bulgaria in advance of the next enlargement. It is also requesting six AD6 posts without financing to able to offer these auxiliary staff permanent posts following the enlargement, providing that they have passed the competition and perform satisfactorily. Otherwise, the Court of Auditors will no longer recruit auxiliary staff from 1 May 2005.
The Court of Auditors is requesting nine other new posts: one AD6 auditor post (to replace a temporary AD12 posts reployed to Cabinet of President), one AD6 to accountancy service as well as two AD6 posts plus five AST3 assistant posts to human resources.
Following a recent call for tenders reducing printing costs, the estimate for Article 270 – Official Journal – for 2006 is EUR 850 000 corresponding to a reduction of 32.16%.
Economic and Social Committee (Section VI)
ESC
Estimates 2005
109.279.818
Budget 2006
103.820.925
Budget 2004 (incl. frontloading to reduce costs in 2005)
102.709.246
Total increase in %
5.3%
Organigramme 2005
636
New posts requested
38
The estimates by the European Economic and Social Committee are set at around EUR 109.3 million, which corresponds to an increase of 5.3 % over 2005 budget.
The Economic and Social Committee is requesting 38 new posts. 30 new posts are requested for the joint services: 27 posts (1 A*12, 19 A*6 and 7 B*3) mainly for translation in view of the next enlargement and three other posts (1 A*6 for IT, 1 A*6 for financial and contract management, 1 B*3 multimedia specialist). Eight other posts (2 A*6, 6 B*3) are requested for different services in its own secretariat (committee on industrial change, external relations, communication, registry, human resources).
Budget items in the increase include office furniture (frontloading in 2004), day nurseries, interpretating and publication in the Official Journal.
In the 2006 guidelines report on other institutions, Parliament stressed the importance of budgetary rigour, especially in relation to property projects. It invited the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions to submit a report to the European Parliament on their building projects and needs for rented office space and on the functioning of the joint services. The EP asked the two institutions to provide reports on the situation as regards the occupation of posts in financial control.
Committee of the Regions (Section VII)
CoR
Estimates 2006
64.484.782
Budget 2005
60.277.251
Budget 2004 (incl. frontloading to reduce costs in 2005)
59.413.031
Total increase in %
6.98%
Organigramme 2004
428
New posts requested
47
The estimates by the Committee of the Regions are set at around EUR 60.3 million, which corresponds to an increase of 6.98 % over 2005 budget.
Contrary to the other institutions, the Committee of the Regions was not allocated all posts it requested in the 2005 procedure (seven posts were not created). It is now requesting 47 new posts (21 for joint services - mainly translators in view of the next enlargement), 3 enlargement posts for the political groups and 21 other posts for its own secretariat, mainly for committee work.
The appropriations for studies and external experts (Article 260) increase by EUR 199 500 corresponding to +30%. Some information lines are also subject to relatively high increases.
Ombudsman (Section VIII A)
Ombudsman
Estimates 2006
7.732.538
Budget 2005
7.312.614
Budget 2004
5.782.968
Total increase 2005/2006 in %
5.7 %
Organigramme 2005
51
New posts requested
6
The European Ombudsman was established in 1995. Since 2000, the Ombudsman's budget is no longer an annex to Parliament's budget, but constitutes a separate Section of the budget. The Ombudsman considers it necessary to revisit the co-operation agreements with the European Parliament and achieve full autonomy in relation to staff management.
The total number of complaints received by the Ombudsman in 2004 was 3 276, representing a 53 % increase compared to the previous year. The number of complaints received in the first quarter of 2005 represents a 38 % increase relative to the preceding year.
The estimates by the Ombudsman are set at around EUR 7.7 million. The increase over 2005 budget amounts to 5.7 %. The Ombudsman requests two A*5 posts and one C*1 posts in view of the next enlargement. In addition, the Ombudsman requests one A*5 and two B*3 posts for direct management of his staff.
European Data-Protection Supervisor (EDPS) (Section VIII B)
EDPS
Estimates 2006
3.610.932
Budget 2005
2.879.305
Budget 2004
1.272.000
Total increase 2005/2006 in %
25 %
Organigramme 2005
19
New posts requested
5
Conversion of posts
-
Upgradings
-
The budget proposal is set at EUR 3.6 million corresponding to an increase of 25 % over the 2005 budget.
The EDPS requests the creation of 5 new permanent posts (3 A*8, 1 B*8 and 1 C*6). The posts are requested at level which would allow for transfers from other institutions.
The increase of staff in 2006 is considered by the EDPS to require the rental of additional premises estimated at 50% of the current premises.
Outlook on the 2006 budget procedure on other institutions
In the coming months, the Rapporteur will meet with representatives of all other institutions, study their estimates in detail and gather information in view of Parliament's first reading.
Following the July budget conciliation and the adoption of Council's Draft Budget, the Rapporteur on other institutions, together with the General Rapporteur on Commission's budget, will present a working document on Heading 5 - Administrative expenditure. An exchange of views with the Secretaries-General of other institutions will take place in the Committee on Budgets in September. Parliament's Secretary-General and the Vice-President responsible for budget will attend a meeting of the Committee on Budgets to present the proposals by the Bureau.
The Committee on Budgets will vote on the budgetary amendments and the budget resolution on other sections in October, in view of the first reading vote in plenary of the budget for 2006 at the end of October 2005.
Due to the tight deadlines, the Rapporteur calls for timely submission of all necessary information to be able to make recommendations, negotiate and table budgetary amendments.
13 September 2005
Council's Draft budget for 2006 on Administrative Expenditure
At its first reading of the 2006 budget, the Council decided to apply a reduction of 2% on current administrative expenditure. As in previous years, the Council claimed that this reduction was possible due to efficiency gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation.
Concerning the Staff related demands of the other institutions, the Council accepted conversions and upgradings, in particular related to career development under the new Staff Regulations. It accepted all new A* posts requested in relation to enlargement and new activities, while significant reductions were applied to B* and C* posts. It also increased the standard flat rate abatement on salaries for some institutions, taking into account their current vacancy rate. It decided to accept 75% of the appropriation requests of the institutions for new posts for pre-enlargement, taking into account the current state of recruitment on new posts granted in the past years.
As a result, the Council set the margin available under this Heading at EUR 130.11 million.
EUR
2005 (AB 1 and 2 included)
PDB 2006
DB 2006
DB-PDB
% DB-2005
Parliament
1 264 024 722
1 341 600 000
1 341 600 000
0
+ 6.1
Council
563 163 403
602 030 000
591 752 953
- 10 277 047
+ 5.1
Court of Justice
228 952 872
253 905 400
246 940 602
- 6 964 798
+ 7.9
Court of Auditors
106 948 579
114 596 500
111 641 491
- 2 955 009
+ 4.4
Economic and Social Cttee
102 836 216
109 279 819
106 794 805
- 2 485 014
+ 3.8
Committee of the Regions
59 749 002
64 487 373
62 103 170
- 2 384 203
+ 3.9
Ombudsman
7 224 554
7 732 538
7 509 482
- 223 056
+ 3.9
Data Protection Supervisor
2 840 733
3 610 932
3 447 233
- 163 699
+ 21.4
TOTAL Other institutions
2 335 740 081
2 497 242 562
2 471 789 736
-25 553 637
+5.8
Commission (excl. pensions)
3 105 195 287
3 295 695 925
3 201 278 377
- 94 417 548
+ 3.1
Pensions
851 432 000
904 818 000
904 818 000
0
+ 6.3
TOTAL Commission
3 956 627 287
4 200 513 925
4 106 096 377
- 94 417 548
+ 3.8
TOTAL Heading 5
6 292 367 368
6 697 756 487
6 577 886 113
- 119 870 374
+4.5
Specific issues on other institutions' budgets
Parliament (Section I)
EP
Estimates 2006 (=DB)
1.341.600.000
Budget 2005(incl. AB 1-2)
1.272.000.000
Budget 2004
1.231.000.000
Total increase in % DB/2005
6.14%
Organigramme 2005
5597
New posts requested
Next enlargement: 135 posts decided in estimates (113 in EP Secretariat, 22 in political groups). 80 contract staff proposed by the Bureau in the first reading.
Non-enlargement: 104 additional posts (plus 4 in the reserve) proposed by the Bureau in the first reading
The European Parliament set its estimates at EUR 1 341.6 million, corresponding to the maximum level of 20% of heading 5. Parliament decided at that stage to enter EUR 90.5 million in the contingency reserve, contrary to the position of the Committee on Budgets to cut this amount by EUR 30 million and to set EUR 10 million in the buildings reserve.
At its meeting of 7 September 2005, the Bureau proposed to keep the budget at 20% of heading 5 to finance new political priorities, notably the strengthening of Parliament’s information and communication policy. The Bureau proposes to create a specific ‘Information’ reserve of EUR 50 million for the following projects: EUR 15 million for initial payments for audiovisual equipment in D4/D5 buildings and the remaining EUR 35 million, for the new Visitor’s Centre in D4 building and a European Parliament web-based television channel. For these two projects, the Bureau will have to take final decisions when detailed proposals and financial costs become available. Should this amount prove to be superior to the needs, Bureau suggests that the budgetary authority decides on alternatives.
The Bureau proposes adjustments for an amount of EUR 9.726 million in connection with preparation for Romanian and Bulgarian accession (mainly to provide for 80 additional contract agents, interpreters, translation and adapt the two hemicycles and office space).
The Bureau proposes to create in Parliament’s Secretariat 40 posts directly linked to the new information and communication policy and 38 posts in other areas where additional needs have arise. No proposal for reallocation of posts within the institution has been made.
In addition to the Secretary-General’s proposals, the Bureau also approved to enter EUR 4.36 million for a new electronic voting system and 4 new posts to manage the system, while awaiting detailed specification on this system. It proposes to create a new budget line with a token entry (p.m.) for a European Parliament Democracy Programme and create 4 posts in the reserve for this purpose, given that the conference of Presidents will discuss the feasibility of this proposal. The Bureau also decided to create 22 C* posts for the assistance of Committee Chairmen and to upgrade the five Quaestors’ assistants from C* to B*.
The proposals by the Bureau are explained in more detail in the letter of 8 September 2005 from President Borrell and Vice-President Cocilovo to Chairman Lewandowski on the first reading of Parliament’s budget for 2006.
Council (Section II)
Council
DB 2006
591 752 953
Estimates 2006
602.000.000
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 2/2005)
563.051.402
Budget 2004
541.912.200
Total increase in % DB /2005
5.08 %
Organigramme 2005
3234
New posts requested
184
(97 for next enlargement)
New posts approved in DB
161 (-23)
The estimates by the Council Secretariat propose that Council’s administrative expenditure in 2006 is set at EUR 602 million. In the DB, the Council allocated for its section of the budget, an overall amount of EUR 591 752 953, which represents an increase of EUR 28 589 550 (+ 5.08%) over the 2005 budget.
Personnel expenditure in title 3 increased by 18% notably for the reinforcement of military seconded national experts and informatics by 53% (13 million) primarily due to the need to fund the Sesame project (Secured European System for Automatic MEssaging), previously ESDP/CORTESY-net project.
Out of the 184 new posts requested in the estimates, 97 posts are requested to meet enlargement needs, 68 correspond to new tasks, 20 are needed for the occupation of the Lex building and one post is transferred to the Commission.
The Council approved the creation of 161 new posts (1 A*15, 4 A*12, 6 A*11, 1 A*10 T, 8 A*9, 12 A*7, 58 A*5, 2 B*7, 6 B*6, 17 B*3, 23 C*4, 23 C*1) and transfer of 1 C*1 post to the Commission.
Court of Justice (Section IV)
ECJ
DB 2006
246 940 602
Estimates 2006
253.900.000
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 1-2/2005)
229.000.000
Budget 2004 (incl. frontloading of EUR 12.6 mio to reduce costs in 2005)
222.400.000
Total increase in %
10.9 %
Organigramme 2004
1717
New posts requested
38
(26 for Civil Service Tribunal)
New posts approved in DB
22 (-16)
(18 for Civil Service Tribunal)
In the DB for 2006, the Council allocated an overall amount of EUR 246 940 602, which represents an increase of EUR 17 987 730 (+ 7.86%) over the 2005 budget.
The new Civil Service Tribunal, which is expected to take up its duties at the beginning of 2006, is included in the estimates for 2006 with EUR 6.9 million of additional expenditure. The requested 26 new posts are to be provided for the new Tribunal: 16 for the cabinets of the seven judges and 10 for the Registry. The other 12 new posts (4 A*6, 7 B*3 and 1 C*1) requested are all for reinforcement of the Informatics and New Technologies Division.
In the DB, the Council approved the appropriations for 8 new Members (7 judges and 1 registrar) for the new Civil Service Tribunal and the creation of 22 new posts (2 A*14 T, 2 A*12 T, 3 A*11 T, 1 A*10 T, 4 A*6, 1 A*5, 1 B*5 T, 3 B*3, 3 B*3 T, 2 C*1) of which 18 for the new Civil Service Tribunal. The Council could not accept the request for 4 B*3. In relation to new Civil Service Tribunal, special attention will be drawn to the request for the creation of 18 posts put forward now by the Court of Justice in the Preliminary Draft Amending Budget 7/2005.
In its estimates, the Court of Justice had requested only the appropriations for the recruitment of 16 contract staff in the lead-up to enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria. In line with the other institutions, it has updated its request and is now requesting the creation of this number of posts
Court of Auditors (Section V)
CoA
DB 2006
111 641 491
Estimates 2006
114.596.500
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 1-2/2005)
106.948.579
Budget 2004 (incl. frontloading of EUR 204.000 to reduce costs in 2005)
97.799.130
Total increase in % DB/2005
4.39 %
Organigramme 2005
736
New posts requested
15
New posts approved in DB
11 (-4)
The estimates by the Court of Auditors are set at around EUR 114.6 million. In the DB, the Council allocated an overall amount of EUR 111 641 491, which represents an increase of EUR 4 692 912 (+ 4.39%) over the 2005 budget.
Six new posts in view of the next enlargement are sought by the Court of Auditors in 2006. The Court of Auditors is requesting nine other new posts: one AD6 auditor post (to replace a temporary AD12 posts redeployed to Cabinet of President), one AD6 to accountancy service as well as two AD6 posts plus five AST3 assistant posts to human resources.
In the DB, the Council accepted the creation of 11 new posts (10 A*6 of which 6 without financing in view of the forthcoming accession of Romania and Bulgaria and 1 B*3) including the removal of 1 temporary A*12. The Council did not accept the request for 4 B*3.
Economic and Social Committee (Section VI)
ESC
DB 2006
106 794 805
Estimates 2006
109.279.818
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 1-2)
102.836.216
Budget 2004 (incl. frontloading to reduce costs in 2005)
102.709.246
Total increase in % DB/2005
3.85%
Organigramme 2005
636
New posts requested
38
New posts approved in DB
28 (-10)
The estimates by the European Economic and Social Committee are set at around EUR 109.3 million. In the DB, the Council allocated an overall amount of EUR 106 794 805, which represents an increase of EUR 3 958 589 (+ 3.85%) over the 2005 budget.
The Economic and Social Committee is requesting 38 new posts. 30 new posts are requested the next enlargement and three other posts (1 A*6 for IT, 1 A*6 for financial and contract management, 1 B*3 multimedia specialist). Eight other posts (2 A*6, 6 B*3) are requested for different services in its own secretariat (committee on industrial change, external relations, communication, registry, human resources).
In the DB, the Council approved the creation of 28 posts (1 A*12, 23 A*6 and 4 B*3 of which 20 related to the pre-enlargement). The Council did not accept the request for 10 B*3.
Committee of the Regions (Section VII)
CoR
DB 2006
62 103 170
Estimates 2006
64.484.782
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 1-2)
59.749.002
Budget 2004 (incl. frontloading to reduce costs in 2005)
59.413.031
Total increase in % DB/2005
3.94%
Organigramme 2004
428
New posts requested
47
New posts approved in DB
20 (-27)
The estimates by the Committee of the Regions are set at around EUR 60.3 million. In the DB, the Council allocated an overall amount of EUR 62 103 170, which represents an increase of EUR 2 354 168 (+ 3.94%) over the 2004 budget.
The estimates requested 47 new posts (21 for joint services - mainly translators in view of the next enlargement), 3 enlargement posts for the political groups and 21 other posts for its own secretariat, mainly for committee work.
In the DB, the Council approved the creation of 20 posts (1 A*12, 18 A*6 of which 14 language-related posts and 1 temporary A*6). The Council did not accept the request for 13 B*3 and for 14 C*1.
Ombudsman (Section VIII A)
Ombudsman
DB 2006
7 509 482
Estimates 2006
7.732.538
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 1-2)
7 224 554
Budget 2004
5.782.968
Total increase DB/2005 in %
3.94%
Organigramme 2005
51
New posts requested
6
New posts approved in DB
4 (-2)
The estimates by the Ombudsman are set at around EUR 7.7 million. In the DB, the Council allocated an overall amount of EUR 7 509 482, which represents an increase of EUR 284 928 (+ 3.94%) over the 2005 budget.
The Ombudsman requests two A*5 posts and one C*1 posts in view of the next enlargement. In addition, the Ombudsman requests one A*5 and two B*3 posts for direct management of his staff.
In the DB, the Council approved the creation of 4 new posts (3 A*5 and 1 C*) for six months, of which 3 for the needs of the forthcoming accession of Romania and Bulgaria (2 A*5 and 1 C*1). The Council did not accept the request for 2 B*3.
European Data-Protection Supervisor (EDPS) (Section VIII B)
EDPS
DB 2006
3.446.233
Estimates 2006
3.610.932
Budget 2005 (incl. AB 1-2)
2.840.733
Budget 2004
1.272.000
Total increase 2005/2006 in %
25 %
Organigramme 2005
19
New posts requested
5
New posts approved in DB
3 (-2)
The budget proposal is set at EUR 3.6. In the DB, the Council allocated an overall amount of EUR 3 447 233, which represents an increase of EUR 606 500 (+ 21.35%) over the 2005 budget. The EDPS requests are affected by the increasing number of Agencies that it needs to supervise.
The EDPS requests the creation of 5 new permanent posts (3 A*8, 1 B*8 and 1 C*6). The posts are requested at level which would allow for transfers from other institutions.
In the DB, the Council approved the creation of 3 new posts (3 A*8). The Council did not accept the request for 1 B*8 and 1 C*6.
Conclusion
During the July conciliation, the European Parliament delegation supported the need to keep an adequate margin under Heading 5, but criticised the method of undifferentiated cross the board cuts used by the Council.
Ensuring a satisfying level of recruitment from the Member States who joined in 2004 remains a priority and the causes of delays or persisting vacancies should be addressed by specific initiatives. In view of the next enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria, a harmonised approach on recruitment during pre-enlargement phase should be considered regarding the creation of posts and status of staff (temporary staff or contractual agents) to ensure level playing field between different institutions.
The Rapporteur reinstates his view that all institutions should improve the rationality of spending by using the available appropriations in a more efficient way concentrating on their core activities. The final levels of budgets of the other institutions will be proposed on the basis of enlargement and non-enlargement evaluation of budgetary needs and application of an appropriate level of budgetary rigour. However, the Rapporteur cannot accept the Council’s undifferentiated approach and will consider the requests institution by institution on the basis of their specific needs in 2006.
As regards the Parliament’s budget, the Rapporteur regrets that the Bureau was not in the position to decide on the political priorities, nor consider the establishment plan measures in July, which would have allowed more time for the Committee on Budgets to better assess the respective allocation of resources and the significant amount of new posts requested.
Now, Bureau has decided that, rather than early payments on buildings, Information and communication policy should be developed but has not provided sufficient information to properly evaluate the budgetary impact of the new information policy projects, such as the audiovisual equipment for D4/D5, EP web television channel and the Visitor’s Centre.
While acknowledging the savings created by accelerated payment on Parliament's buildings, the Rapporteur notes that Parliament’s budget in the last several years has been overestimated. This has lead to large amounts of 'ramassage' and even significant cancellations of appropriations. Only proposals based on justified needs ( P6_TA-PROV(2005)0181 , par 27), should be introduced in Parliament's budget and the level of EP budget and the amounts in reserve should be assessed cautiously and budgeted at the appropriate level.
12.9.2005
MNENJE ODBORA ZA MEDNARODNO TRGOVINO
za Odbor za proračun
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006
( C6-0300/2005 - 2005/2002(BUD) )
Drugi oddelki, Oddelek I - Parlament
Pripravljavec mnenja:
David Martin
POBUDE
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino poziva Odbor za proračun, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
1. poudarja, da Evropski parlament skupaj z Medparlamentarno unijo, mednarodno organizacijo s sedežem v Ženevi, spodbuja, organizira in sofinancira tako imenovane "parlamentarne konference o Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji" (WTO). Tovrstne konference so forumi, kjer poslanci parlamentov iz celotnega sveta izmenjujejo mnenja, informacije in izkušnje glede vprašanj s področja mednarodne trgovine, hkrati pa prispevajo k parlamentarni dimenziji WTO tako, da: i) nadzorujejo dejavnosti WTO in spodbujajo k učinkovitosti in poštenosti; ii) spodbujajo transparentnost postopkov WTO in izboljšujejo dialog med vladami, parlamenti in civilno družbo; iii) povečujejo usposobljenost parlamentov na področju mednarodne trgovine in vplivajo na smer razprav znotraj WTO;
2. ponavlja, da si je Evropski parlament izrecno zadal za cilj spremljati pogajanja WTO s parlamentarnim procesom in organizirati parlamentarne konference ter zato poudarja, da bo v prihodnosti obstajala stalna potreba po financiranju te ključne dejavnosti. V letu 2005 mora Parlament na primer financirati parlamentarno konferenco, ki bo med ministrskim srečanjem WTO decembra v Hong Kongu, v letu 2006 pa pomagati pri organizaciji parlamentarne konference v Ženevi;
3. zahteva, da se uvede nova proračunska postavka za financiranje dejavnosti Evropskega parlamenta v okviru parlamentarne dimenzije WTO. Proračunska postavka bo omogočila večjo preglednost porabe sredstev, povezane s parlamentarno dimenzijo WTO. Za leta, ko parlamentarna konferenca WTO sovpada z ministrskim srečanjem WTO, bi bilo treba dodeliti znesek v višini 500 000 EUR. Za druga leta, ko parlamentarna konferenca WTO ne sovpada z ministrskim srečanjem WTO tako kot v letu 2006, so organizacijski stroški manjši, zato bi bilo treba dodeliti znesek v višini 150 000 EUR.
POSTOPEK
Naslov
Predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006
Oddelek I - Parlament
Številka postopka
2005/2002(BUD)
Pristojni odbor
BUDG
Odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
INTA
Okrepljeno sodelovanje
ne
Pripravljavec (-ka) osnutka Datum imenovanja
David Martin 14.3.2005
Obravnava v odboru
12.7.2005
30.8.2005
Datum sprejetja pobud
12.9.2005
Izid končnega glasovanja
za:
proti:
vzdržani:
26
0
1
Poslanci, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Kader Arif, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Daniel Caspary, Françoise Castex, Giulietto Chiesa, Glyn Ford, Béla Glattfelder, Jacky Henin, Erika Mann, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Georgios Papastamkos, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Tokia Saïfi, Johan Van Hecke, Zbigniew Zaleski
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Margrietus van den Berg, Reimer Böge, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Elisa Ferreira, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Zuzana Roithová, Antolín Sánchez Presedo
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju v skladu s členom 178(2)
Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Gérard Onesta
4.10.2005
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PRORAČUNSKI NADZOR
za Odbor za proračun
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006
( C6-0300/2005 - 2005/2002(BUD) )
Pripravljavec mnenja:
Christopher Heaton-Harris
KRATKA OBRAZLOŽITEV
V tem poročilu je cilj vašega pripravljavca mnenja zagotoviti, da proračun spoštuje pravila in sledi politikam, ki jih je sprejel Parlament na področju finančnega upravljanja in boja proti goljufijam. Spodaj obravnavane točke izhajajo iz pregleda izvajanja proračuna, iz sklepov o razrešnicah, ki jih je sprejel Parlament, poročilih o upravljanju s proračunom s strani Evropskega računskega sodišča in sklepov Parlamenta o boju proti goljufijam.
Računsko sodišče
1. Wynnovo poročilo o razrešnici splošnega proračuna za proračunsko leto 2003 z dne 12. aprila 2005 poziva Računsko sodišče, naj izdela letno poročilo o uspešnosti delovanja in na svoji spletni strani objavi revizijski priročnik ter informacije o pristopu k izjavi o zanesljivosti (DAS)
P6_TA-2005-0092 , odstavka 71-72. Wynnovo poročilo se tudi sprašuje, če bi bilo potrebno ponovno oceniti ustreznost trenutne sestave in delovanja "vodstva" Računskega sodišča, še zlasti velikega števila zaposlenih na stopnji A v kabinetih poslancev.
P6_TA-2005-0092 , odstavek 78.
Uporaba službenih avtomobilov
2. Upravna odločba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 31. marca 2004 in upravna odločba Evropskega računskega sodišča z dne 15. junija 2004 dovoljujeta zasebno rabo službenih avtomobilov. Zasebna raba službenega avtomobila predstavlja prikrito materialno korist, za katero je Parlament mnenja, da je neprimerna. Vaš pripravljavec mnenja meni, da bi bilo treba precejšen delež za to namenjenih proračunskih sredstev vpisati v rezervo, dokler ne bodo omenjene odločbe ustrezno popravljene.
POBUDE
Odbor za proračunski nadzor poziva Odbor za proračun, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
1. poziva Računsko sodišče, da se do 1. novembra 2005 odzove na poziv Parlamenta, naj izdela letno poročilo o uspešnosti delovanja in na svoji spletni strani objavi revizijski priročnik ter informacije o pristopu k izjavi o zanesljivosti (DAS), kakor tudi na priporočilo Parlamenta, po katerem bi bilo treba strukturo in delovanje vodstva Računskega sodišča, zlasti visokega deleža zaposlenih na stopnji A v kabinetih poslancev, ponovno preučiti;
2. poziva Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti , da do 1. novembra 2005 dopolni svojo upravno odločbo z dne 31. marca 2004 na tak način, da bo v bodoče izključena uporaba službenih avtomobilov v zasebne namene;
3. poziva Računsko sodišče, da do 1. novembra 2005 dopolni svojo upravno odločbo z dne 15. junija 2004 na tak način, da bo v bodoče izključena uporaba službenih avtomobilov v zasebne namene.
POSTOPEK
Naslov
Predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006- Drugi oddelki
Referenčni dokumenti
2005/2002(BUD)
Pristojni odbor
BUDG
Odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
CONT 16.3.2005
Okrepljeno sodelovanje
ne
Pripravljavec(-ka) mnenja Datum imenovanja
Christopher Heaton-Harris 16.3.2005
Obravnava v odboru
12.9.2005
Datum sprejetja sprememb
3.10.2005
Izid končnega glasovanja
za:
proti:
vzdržani:
11
0
1
Poslanci, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Simon Busuttil, Szabolcs Fazakas, Ingeborg Gräßle, Umberto Guidoni, Bart Staes, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Alexander Stubb, Jeffrey Titford, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Terence Wynn
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Edit Herczog, Esko Seppänen
16.9.2005
MNENJE ODBORA ZA DRŽAVLJANSKE SVOBOŠČINE, PRAVOSODJE IN NOTRANJE ZADEVE
za Odbor za proračun
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006
Oddelek I - Evropski parlament
Oddelek II - Svet
Oddelek IV - Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti
Oddelek V - Računsko sodišče
Oddelek VI - Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor
Oddelek VII - Odbor regij
Oddelek VIII (A) - Evropski varuh človekovih pravic
Oddelek VIII (B) - Evropski varuh osebnih podatkov
( C6-0300/2005 - 2005/2002(BUD) )
Pripravljavec mnenja:
Gérard Deprez
POBUDE
Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve poziva Odbor za proračun, kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
Evropski parlament - oddelek 1
- poziva pristojne organe Parlamenta, da pospešijo postopke zaposlovanja in zapolnijo 308 delovnih mest, nepovezanih s širitvijo, ki se sprostijo konec julija 2005; zahteva povečan trud pri zaposlovanju tolmačev in prevajalcev za nove jezike; predlaga, naj se nekaj prostih delovnih mest prerazporedi tako, da se poveča število osebja v sekretariatih odborov;
Svet - oddelek II
- še enkrat poziva Svet, naj za schengenske organe in carinske nadzorne organe priskrbi zadostna sredstva, ki jim bodo omogočala izvajanje potrebnega nadzora.
POSTOPEK
Naslov
Predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006: drugi oddelki
Št. postopka
2005/2002(BUD)
Pristojni odbor
BUDG
Odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje
Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
LIBE 0.0.0000
Okrepljeno sodelovanje
Pripravljavec(-ka) mnenja Datum imenovanja
Gérard Deprez 6.6.2005
Obravnava v odboru
13.9.2005
14.9.2005
21.6.2005
12.7.2005
Datum sprejetja pobud
14.9.2005
Izid končnega glasovanja
za:
proti:
vzdržani:
33
0
0
Poslanci, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Alexander Nuno Alvaro, Alfredo Antoniozzi, Edit Bauer, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Els De Groen-Kouwenhoven, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Rosa Díez González, Antoine Duquesne, Kinga Gál, Adeline Hazan, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Jaime Mayor Oreja, Athanasios Pafilis, Martine Roure, Inger Segelström, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Stefano Zappalà, Tatjana Ždanoka
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Gérard Deprez, Marie-Line Reynaud, Agnes Schierhuber, Antonio Tajani, Rainer Wieland
Namestniki (člen 178(2)), navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
19.7.2005
MNENJE ODBORA ZA PETICIJE
za Odbor za proračun
o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006
(C6-0000/2005 - 2005/2002(BUD)
Oddelek I - Evropski parlament
Oddelek II - Svet
Oddelek IV - Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti
Oddelek V - Računsko sodišče
Oddelek VI - Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor
Oddelek VII - Odbor regij
Oddelek VIII (A) - Evropski varuh človekovih pravic
Oddelek VIII (B) - Evropski varuh osebnih podatkov
( C6-0300/2005 - 2005/2002(BUD) )
Pripravljavec mnenja: Andreas Schwab
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
The Petitions Committee has taken note of the European Ombudsman's estimates of the budgetary requirements of his office for the year 2006, which he submitted to the budgetary authority in accordance with Article 31 of Regulation 1605/2002. The total requested budget amounts to €7.732.538, representing a slight increase of 3% (in real terms) as compared with the current year's budget.
When considering the estimates, it should be recalled that the Ombudsman's tasks are of fundamental importance . Firstly, he has the responsibility to examine an ever growing number of complaints by EU citizens on cases of possible maladministration within the EU institutions and to conduct inquiries where appropriate. In doing so, he not only ensures that the rights and interests of EU citizens are safeguarded but also contributes to increasing transparency and improving the quality of services provided by the European Administration. The second core task of the Ombudsman consists in communicating and reaching out to the citizens in an enlarged EU, in order to make them aware of their rights deriving from EU law and with the intention of bringing them closer to the EU institutions. It is essential that the European Ombudsman is given adequate means to carry out these tasks in the most effective way possible.
The increase relative to the current budgetary year must be considered against the background of evolving trends in the workload of the Ombudsman's office . Firstly, the growing awareness of citizens in the enlarged EU has caused a continuous increase in the number of complaints over the years. This upward trend is confirmed by the figures available for the first months of 2005, which indicate an increase of 38% compared to the reference period in 2004. Secondly, the Ombudsman has considerably stepped up communication activities as can be seen from his latest annual report and the wide range of publications being made available to EU citizens. Furthermore, the Ombudsman increasingly communicates with citizens through the internet. While the use of e-mail provides a great opportunity for citizens to communicate efficiently with the institutions, it creates a significant extra workload for the Ombudsman's administration as it has to respond rapidly and comprehensively to a growing number of inquiries.
The Ombudsman is keen to develop close relations with his colleagues from Bulgaria and Romania in the run-up to the next enlargement , with a view to integrating them quickly into the European Network of Ombudsmen. It is also evident that his office must have the human resources necessary to address the anticipated increase in workload related to complaints and the general increase of work to be carried out in two new official languages.
Pobude
Odbor za peticije poziva Odbor za proračun, kot pristojni odbor, da upošteva sledeče točke:
1. Splošna raven proračuna 2006
Odbor za peticije meni, da bi celoten znesek proračunskih sredstev, ki ga je zahteval varuh človekovih pravic le-temu omogočil izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti in učinkovito izvajanje nalog, ki so mu bile zaupane. Omejena rast v višini 3 % (v realni vrednosti), v primerjavi s proračunom 2005, je primerna ob upoštevanju predvidene širitve, ki bo vključila Bolgarijo in Romunijo in splošno povečane količine dela zaradi rastočega števila pritožb, povečane pokritosti jezikov in okrepljenih prizadevanj na področju komunikacije.
2. Zahteva varuha človekovih pravic za avtonomno upravljanje z osebjem
Trenutno o osebju Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic odloča služba Evropskega parlamenta v skladu s členom 195(4) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in členom 11 Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta o pravilih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje funkcije varuha človekovih pravic. Varuh človekovih pravic meni, da mu bo nadaljevanje tega sistema onemogočalo imeti pristojnosti neodvisne institucije pri izvajanju pravnih aktov, predvidenih v kadrovskih predpisih. Trenutni sistem, ki sestoji iz nakazovanja letnega pavšalnega zneska Evropskemu parlamentu za izdajanje nedoločenega števila aktov v zvezi z upravljanjem osebja, ne bo zagotovil popolne preglednosti in učinkovitosti proračuna. Poleg tega je za uradnike Parlamenta težko določiti prednostne naloge, ki zadevajo delo varuha človekovih pravic neodvisno od dela Parlamenta. V prihodnje si varuh človekovih pravic želi biti neposredno odgovoren za upravljanje s svojim osebjem. Zato prosi za odprtje enega A*5 in dveh B*3 delovnih mest. S tem povezani dodatni izdatki bodo nadomeščeni z zmanjšanjem zgoraj omenjenega pavšalnega zneska.
Odbor za peticije priporoča, da pristojni odbor z vidika učinkovitega proračunskega nadzora Parlamenta temeljito preuči očitne prednosti in možne slabosti tega predloga. Zahteva varuha človekovih pravic za neodvisno upravljaje z osebjem mora biti pretehtana v odnosu do cilja, ki želi preprečiti podvajanje upravnega in tehničnega osebja, ter obenem zagotoviti zaščito interesov uprave Parlamenta.
3. Kadrovske zahteve Evropskega varuha človekovih pravice pred pristopom Bolgarije in Romunije
Odbor v celoti podpira zahtevo varuha človekovih pravic za odprtje novih delovnih mest v okviru širitve. Predlog za odprtje dveh novih A*5 delovnih mest za zaposlitev enega pravnika iz vsake od dveh bodočih novih držav članic ter enega C*1 delovnega mesta je v celoti utemeljen.
4. Postavka 2500
Zadevna proračunska postavka, med drugimi možnostmi, predvideva v določenih okoliščinah povračilo potnih stroškov avtorjem peticij iz proračuna Parlamenta, če bodo predhodno pridobili odobritev. Pokriva tudi izdatke dnevnic za hotele ter dodatne stroške. Odbor za peticije meni, da je ta možnost bistvenega pomena, saj je že na pozitiven način doprinesla k zmožnostim odbora, da se bolje odziva na potrebe evropskih državljanov.
POSTOPEK
Naslov
Predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006- Drugi oddelki
Št. postopka
2005/2002(BUD)
Pristojni odbor
BUDG
Odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje Datum razglasitve na zasedanju
PETI
Okrepljeno sodelovanje
Pripravljavec(-ka) mnenja Datum imenovanja
Andreas Schwab
24.52005
Obravnava v odboru
15.6.2005
Datum sprejetja pobud
13.7.2005
Izid končnega glasovanja
za:
proti:
vzdržani:
15
0
0
Poslanci, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Robert Atkins, Inés Ayala Sender, Michael Cashman, Proinsias De Rossa, Janelly Fourtou, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, David Hammerstein Mintz, Mairead McGuinness, Maria Matsouka, Manolis Mavrommatis, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Andreas Schwab
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Marie-Hélène Descamps
Namestniki (člen 178(2)), navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Albert Deß, Doris Pack
POSTOPEK
Naslov
Predlog splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006
Oddelek I - Evropski parlament,
Oddelek II - Svet
Oddelek IV - Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti
Oddelek V - Računsko sodišče
Oddelek VI - Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor
Oddelek VII - Odbor regij
Oddelek VIII (A) - Evropski varuh človekovih pravic
Oddelek VIII (B) - Evropski varuh osebnih podatkov
Referenčni dokumenti
C6‑0300/2005 – 2005/2002(BUD)
Pravna podlaga
člen 272 ES
Podlaga v Poslovniku
člen 69 in Priloga IV
Pristojni odbor
Datum predložitve
BUDG
29.9.2005
Odbori, zaprošeni za mnenje
Datum predložitve
vsi
Poročevalec(-ka) Datum imenovanja
Valdis Dombrovskis 6.12.2004
Nadomeščeni(-a) poročevalec(-ka)
Predhodni predlog splošnega proračuna
Datum predložitve s strani Komisije
KOM(2005)0300
27.4.2005
Datum, ko je Svet pripravil predlog splošnega proračuna
15.7.2005
Datum, ko je Svet posredoval predlog splošnega proračuna
29.9.2005
Pisna (e) spremeba (e)
Obravnava v odboru
29.9.2005
4.10.2005
13.10.2005
Datum sprejetja
13.10.2005
Izid končnega glasovanja
za: 35
proti: 1
vzdržani: 0
Poslanci, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Richard James Ashworth, Reimer Böge, Simon Busuttil, Paulo Casaca, Gérard Deprez, Valdis Dombrovskis, Brigitte Douay, James Elles, Neena Gill, Ingeborg Gräßle, Louis Grech, Nathalie Griesbeck, Catherine Guy-Quint, Jutta D. Haug, Anne E. Jensen, Wiesław Stefan Kuc, Zbigniew Krzysztof Kuźmiuk, Alain Lamassoure, Janusz Lewandowski, Vladimír Maňka, Mario Mauro, Gérard Onesta, Giovanni Pittella, Wojciech Roszkowski, Antonis Samaras, Esko Seppänen, Nina Škottová, László Surján, Helga Trüpel, Ralf Walter
Namestniki, navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Hans-Peter Martin, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Paul Rübig, José Albino Silva Peneda, Peter Šťastný
Namestniki (člen 178(2)), navzoči pri končnem glasovanju
Datum predložitve– A6
17.10.2005
A6-0307/2005
Pripombe
...
